• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

报告随机对照试验中的失访情况。

Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials.

作者信息

Dumville Jo C, Torgerson David J, Hewitt Catherine E

机构信息

York Trials Unit, University of York, York YO10 5DD.

出版信息

BMJ. 2006 Apr 22;332(7547):969-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7547.969.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.332.7547.969
PMID:16627519
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1444839/
Abstract

Loss to follow-up can greatly affect the strength of a trial's findings. But most reports do not give readers enough information for them to be able to understand the potential effects

摘要

失访会极大地影响试验结果的说服力。但大多数报告并未向读者提供足够信息，使他们能够理解潜在影响。

相似文献

1
Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials.报告随机对照试验中的失访情况。
BMJ. 2006 Apr 22;332(7547):969-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7547.969.
2
Multiplicity in oncology randomised controlled trials: a threat to medical evidence?肿瘤学随机对照试验中的多样性：对医学证据的一种威胁？
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1638-1640. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30744-2.
3
Attrition in randomized controlled clinical trials: methodological issues in psychopharmacology.随机对照临床试验中的损耗：精神药理学的方法学问题
Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 1;59(11):1001-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.020. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
4
The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity.对168项随机对照试验进行分析以检验数据完整性。
Anaesthesia. 2012 Jun;67(6):669-70; author reply 670. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07189.x. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
5
[Introduction to randomized trials: attrition bias].[随机试验介绍：失访偏倚]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2012 Jan;40(1):64-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
6
Describing the participants in a study.描述一项研究中的参与者。
Age Ageing. 2017 Jul 1;46(4):576-581. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx054.
7
Dropouts and missing data in psychiatric clinical trials.精神科临床试验中的脱落与数据缺失
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;166(11):1295; author reply 1295-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09070959.
8
How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies?在长期随机试验和前瞻性研究中，可接受的随访失访率是多少？
Arch Dis Child. 2008 Jun;93(6):458-61. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.127316.
9
Association between bibliometric parameters, reporting and methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in vascular and endovascular surgery.血管和血管内手术随机对照试验的文献计量学参数、报告与方法学质量之间的关联
Vascular. 2017 Apr;25(2):196-207. doi: 10.1177/1708538116653289. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
10
Introducing the new CONSORT extension for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.介绍用于阶梯楔形整群随机试验的新CONSORT扩展。
Trials. 2019 Jan 18;20(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3116-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of identity-oriented psychotrauma therapy on Hashimoto disease activity: a randomised controlled trial.身份导向性心理创伤疗法对桥本氏病活动的影响：一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2520636. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2520636. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
The Unsolved Problem of Attrition Rates on Randomized Clinical Trials for Cocaine Use Disorders: A Scoping Review.可卡因使用障碍随机临床试验中损耗率的未解决问题：一项范围综述。
Subst Use Addctn J. 2025 Jul;46(3):757-782. doi: 10.1177/29767342251326374. Epub 2025 May 5.
3
Around the EQUATOR With Clin-STAR: Systematic Reviews of Intervention Effectiveness; Challenges and Opportunities.借助临床之星在赤道周围开展：干预效果的系统评价；挑战与机遇
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Aug;73(8):2356-2365. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19498. Epub 2025 May 2.
4
Comment on "Effects of nurse-led symptom management in chronic myeloid malignancies: a randomized trial".对“护士主导的症状管理在慢性髓系恶性肿瘤中的效果：一项随机试验”的评论
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Apr 28;33(5):429. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09488-5.
5
Assessment of -Associated Retinopathies Using the S-MAIA Fast Protocol and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.使用S-MAIA快速协议和频域光学相干断层扫描评估相关视网膜病变。
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 21;13(3):555. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030555.
6
The Nuffield Early Language Intervention (NELI) programme is associated with lasting improvements in children's language and reading skills.纳菲尔德早期语言干预（NELI）项目与儿童语言和阅读技能的持久提升相关。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14157.
7
From ideation to real context of use of a digital solution to promote physical and cognitive training for older adults.从构思到数字解决方案在促进老年人身体和认知训练方面的实际应用场景。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 13;15(1):1867. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83534-w.
8
Attrition and discontinuation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials: a meta-analysis.肌萎缩侧索硬化症临床试验中的失访与停药：一项荟萃分析。
J Neurol. 2024 Dec 12;272(1):40. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12813-3.
9
Counteract Anhedonia! Introducing an Online-Training to Enhance Reward Experiencing - A Pilot Study.对抗快感缺失！推出一项增强奖励体验的在线训练——一项试点研究。
Clin Psychol Eur. 2024 Jun 28;6(2):e13751. doi: 10.32872/cpe.13751. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation With versus Without Mirabegron: A Randomized Controlled Trial.胫后神经刺激联合与不联合米拉贝隆治疗的随机对照试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Aug;35(8):1709-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05835-y. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals.分配隐藏的充分性及报告情况：对四种综合医学期刊近期发表试验的综述
BMJ. 2005 May 7;330(7499):1057-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38413.576713.AE. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
2
Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.调查荟萃分析中的患者排除偏倚。
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;34(1):79-87. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh300. Epub 2004 Nov 23.
3
Randomized controlled trial of hip protectors among women living in the community.社区女性中髋部保护器的随机对照试验。
Osteoporos Int. 2004 Sep;15(9):701-6. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1599-0. Epub 2004 Mar 3.
4
Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis.随机分组后的排除标准：意向性分析原则及将患者排除在分析之外。
BMJ. 2002 Sep 21;325(7365):652-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7365.652.
5
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.《CONSORT 声明：改进平行组随机试验报告质量的修订建议》
Lancet. 2001 Apr 14;357(9263):1191-4.
6
What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials.意向性分析是什么意思？已发表随机对照试验的调查。
BMJ. 1999 Sep 11;319(7211):670-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670.
7
Understanding controlled trials: baseline imbalance in randomised controlled trials.理解对照试验：随机对照试验中的基线失衡
BMJ. 1999 Jul 17;319(7203):185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7203.185.
8
Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials.在临床试验中测试基线平衡。
Stat Med. 1994 Sep 15;13(17):1715-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131703.
9
Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trials.临床试验中的协变量不平衡与随机分配
Stat Med. 1989 Apr;8(4):467-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080410.