• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神疾病患者的污名化:皇家精神科医学院“改变观念”运动的后续研究。

Stigmatization of people with mental illnesses: a follow-up study within the Changing Minds campaign of the Royal College of Psychiatrists.

机构信息

Royal College of Psychiatrists, 17 Belgrave Square, London SW1X 8PG, UK.

出版信息

World Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;4(2):106-13.

PMID:16633526
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1414750/
Abstract

A population survey before the start of the Changing Minds campaign showed that negative opinions about people with mental illnesses were widely held, and that opinions about different disorders differed in important ways. We repeated the survey 5 years later, when the campaign had ended. Interviews were again conducted with a representative population sample (1725 interviews; response rate 65%), enquiring about demographic variables, about eight opinions concerning seven common mental disorders, and whether the respondents knew anyone with one of these mental disorders. The pattern of response in this second survey resembled that in the first. However, there were significant changes. Though often small, apart from reported opinions concerning treatment and outcome, they were all reductions in the percentages of stigmatizing opinions. Seventy seven percent of respondents reported knowing someone with one of the seven disorders. Those who did so in respect of severe depression or panic and phobias were less likely to have stigmatizing opinions about people with the corresponding disorder, but the same did not apply to the other disorders. The greatest proportion of negative opinions was in the 16-19 year age group, and respondents with higher education were less likely than the rest to express such views. We conclude that stigmatizing opinions are frequent in the community but the various disorders are not stigmatized in the same way. Campaigns to reduce stigma should take account of these differences, and of the need to address young people.

摘要

一项在“改变观念”运动开始前进行的人群调查显示,人们对精神疾病患者持有普遍的负面看法,而且不同精神障碍的看法在重要方面存在差异。5 年后,当该运动结束时,我们再次进行了这项调查。再次对代表性人群样本(1725 次访谈;回应率为 65%)进行了访谈,询问人口统计学变量、关于七种常见精神障碍的八项意见,以及受访者是否认识患有这些精神障碍之一的人。第二次调查的反应模式与第一次相似。然而,存在显著变化。尽管通常很小,但除了关于治疗和结果的意见外,所有这些变化都是减少污名化意见的百分比。77%的受访者报告认识患有七种疾病之一的人。那些在严重抑郁或恐慌和恐惧症方面认识到这一点的人对患有相应障碍的人持有的污名化意见较少,但其他障碍则不然。负面意见比例最高的是 16-19 岁年龄组,受过高等教育的受访者比其他人更不可能表达这种观点。我们得出的结论是,污名化观点在社区中很普遍,但各种障碍并没有以同样的方式受到污名化。减少污名化的运动应该考虑到这些差异,以及解决年轻人问题的必要性。

相似文献

1
Stigmatization of people with mental illnesses: a follow-up study within the Changing Minds campaign of the Royal College of Psychiatrists.精神疾病患者的污名化:皇家精神科医学院“改变观念”运动的后续研究。
World Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;4(2):106-13.
2
Stigmatisation of people with mental illnesses.对精神疾病患者的污名化。
Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;177:4-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.1.4.
3
Crazy'App: A web survey on representations and attitudes toward mental disorders using video testimonies.疯狂 APP:一项使用视频证言调查人们对精神障碍的看法和态度的网络调查。
Encephale. 2019 Sep;45(4):290-296. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
4
[Psychiatrist views on stigmatization toward people with mental illness and recommendations].[精神科医生对精神疾病患者污名化的看法及建议]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2010 Spring;21(1):14-24.
5
Stigmatizing attitudes of Swiss youth towards peers with mental disorders.瑞士青年对患有精神障碍的同龄人持污名化态度。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 24;15(7):e0235034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235034. eCollection 2020.
6
Stigmatization of psychiatrists by pedagogues.教育工作者对精神科医生的污名化。
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2017 Dec 22;43(258):264-267.
7
Young people's stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders: findings from an Australian national survey.年轻人对精神障碍患者的污名化态度:来自澳大利亚全国性调查的结果。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;45(12):1033-9. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2011.614216. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
8
The attitudes of psychiatrists toward people suffering from mental illnesses.精神科医生对患有精神疾病者的态度。
Psychiatr Pol. 2017 Feb 26;51(1):29-44. doi: 10.12740/PP/62400.
9
Public Stigma Toward People With Drug Addiction: A Factorial Survey.公众对药物成瘾者的污名化:一项析因调查。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 May;78(3):415-425. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.415.
10
Perceived Stigma among Recipients of Mental Health Care in the General Canadian Population.加拿大普通人群心理健康护理接受者中的感知耻辱感。
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;61(8):480-8. doi: 10.1177/0706743716639928. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Stigmatisation of survivors of political persecution in the GDR: attitudes of healthcare professionals.民主德国政治迫害幸存者的污名化:医疗专业人员的态度
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 10;16:1556411. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1556411. eCollection 2025.
2
Myths and facts about alcohol use disorder: a Delphi consensus study.酒精使用障碍的误区与事实:一项德尔菲共识研究。
Brain Commun. 2025 Jan 27;7(1):fcaf035. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf035. eCollection 2025.
3
Unveiling the landscape of antistigma interventions for individuals with substance use disorders: A scoping review.揭示针对物质使用障碍患者的反污名化干预措施的全貌:一项范围综述。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;66(12):1101-1123. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_770_24. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
4
Impact of a Virtual Reality Intervention on Stigma, Empathy, and Attitudes Toward Patients With Psychotic Disorders Among Mental Health Care Professionals: Randomized Controlled Trial.虚拟现实干预对精神卫生保健专业人员对精神病患者的污名、同理心和态度的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jan 21;12:e66925. doi: 10.2196/66925.
5
Chinese College Students' Stigmatization towards People with Mental Illness: Familiarity, Perceived Dangerousness, Fear, and Social Distance.中国大学生对精神疾病患者的污名化:熟悉程度、感知到的危险性、恐惧及社会距离
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 27;12(17):1715. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171715.
6
Developing practical strategies to reduce addiction-related stigma and discrimination in public addiction treatment centers: a mixed-methods study protocol.制定切实可行的策略,减少公共成瘾治疗中心与成瘾相关的污名和歧视:一项混合方法研究方案。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024 May 16;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00472-8.
7
Should we promote alcohol problems as a continuum? Implications for policy and practice.我们是否应将酒精问题视为一个连续统一体?对政策与实践的影响。
Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2024;31(2):271-281. doi: 10.1080/09687637.2023.2187681. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
8
Factors impacting intent to seek treatment within youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.影响临床精神病高危青年寻求治疗意愿的因素。
Schizophr Res. 2024 May;267:273-281. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.03.047. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
9
(Mis)understanding alcohol use disorder: Making the case for a public health first approach.(对)酒精使用障碍的误解:倡导公共卫生优先方法。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Dec 1;253:111019. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111019. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
10
Healthcare professionals' knowledge, confidence and attitudes in relation to psychosis care: A systematic review.医护专业人员对精神疾病护理的知识、信心和态度:系统综述。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;69(8):1856-1868. doi: 10.1177/00207640231194490. Epub 2023 Sep 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness.了解污名对精神疾病患者的影响。
World Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;1(1):16-20.
2
Stigma: the feelings and experiences of 46 people with mental illness. Qualitative study.污名:46名精神疾病患者的感受与经历。定性研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;184:176-81. doi: 10.1192/bjp.184.2.176.
3
Iatrogenic stigma of mental illness.精神疾病的医源性污名
BMJ. 2002 Jun 22;324(7352):1470-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7352.1470.
4
Stigmatisation of people with mental illnesses.对精神疾病患者的污名化。
Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;177:4-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.1.4.
5
Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study.1990 - 2020年按病因划分的死亡率和残疾率的替代预测:全球疾病负担研究
Lancet. 1997 May 24;349(9064):1498-504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07492-2.
6
Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study.全球死亡率、残疾率及风险因素的影响:全球疾病负担研究
Lancet. 1997 May 17;349(9063):1436-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07495-8.
7
Public education for community care. A new approach.社区护理的公众教育。一种新方法。
Br J Psychiatry. 1996 Apr;168(4):441-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.168.4.441.