• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿奇霉素短程治疗鼻窦炎及其他上呼吸道感染:与红霉素和阿莫西林的比较。欧洲阿奇霉素研究组

Short-course treatment of sinusitis and other upper respiratory tract infections with azithromycin: a comparison with erythromycin and amoxycillin. European Azithromycin Study Group.

作者信息

Felstead S J, Daniel R

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, Pfizer Central Research, Sandwich, UK.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1991 Sep-Oct;19(5):363-72. doi: 10.1177/030006059101900502.

DOI:10.1177/030006059101900502
PMID:1660823
Abstract

In two randomized, multicentre studies patients with upper respiratory tract infections treated with 1.5 g azithromycin in five or six doses over 5 days were compared with patients treated with 10 g erythromycin in 40 doses over 10 days or 15 g amoxycillin in 30 doses over 10 days. The majority of azithromycin- (65%) and erythromycin- (67%) treated patients in the azithromycin/erythromycin study and all patients in the azithromycin/amoxycillin study had sinusitis. Clinical cure was recorded in 83% of azithromycin- and 79% of erythromycin-treated patients, and in 81% and 87%, respectively, of azithromycin- and amoxycillin-treated patients. There was no significant difference in bacteriological eradication between the treatments. Adverse events, predominantly mild or moderate gastro-intestinal complaints, occurred in 17% and 15%, respectively, of azithromycin- and erythromycin-treated patients, and in 5% and 11%, respectively, of azithromycin- and amoxycillin-treated patients but there were no serious laboratory safety abnormalities. Azithromycin appeared to be an effective, simplified treatment for upper respiratory tract infections and may improve patient compliance compared with standard therapies.

摘要

在两项随机、多中心研究中,将5天内分五或六剂服用1.5克阿奇霉素治疗上呼吸道感染的患者,与10天内分40剂服用10克红霉素或10天内分30剂服用15克阿莫西林治疗的患者进行了比较。在阿奇霉素/红霉素研究中,大多数接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者(65%)和接受红霉素治疗的患者(67%)以及阿奇霉素/阿莫西林研究中的所有患者都患有鼻窦炎。接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者中有83%、接受红霉素治疗的患者中有79%记录了临床治愈,接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者和接受阿莫西林治疗的患者中分别有81%和87%记录了临床治愈。各治疗组之间的细菌清除率没有显著差异。不良事件主要为轻度或中度胃肠道不适,接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者和接受红霉素治疗的患者中分别有17%和15%出现不良事件,接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者和接受阿莫西林治疗的患者中分别有5%和11%出现不良事件,但没有严重的实验室安全异常情况。与标准疗法相比,阿奇霉素似乎是一种有效的、简化的上呼吸道感染治疗方法,可能会提高患者的依从性。

相似文献

1
Short-course treatment of sinusitis and other upper respiratory tract infections with azithromycin: a comparison with erythromycin and amoxycillin. European Azithromycin Study Group.阿奇霉素短程治疗鼻窦炎及其他上呼吸道感染:与红霉素和阿莫西林的比较。欧洲阿奇霉素研究组
J Int Med Res. 1991 Sep-Oct;19(5):363-72. doi: 10.1177/030006059101900502.
2
Simplified treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infection with azithromycin: a comparison with erythromycin and amoxycillin. European Azithromycin Study Group.阿奇霉素简化治疗急性下呼吸道感染:与红霉素和阿莫西林的比较。欧洲阿奇霉素研究组
J Int Med Res. 1991 Sep-Oct;19(5):373-83. doi: 10.1177/030006059101900503.
3
Comparison of azithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with upper respiratory tract infections.阿奇霉素与克拉霉素治疗上呼吸道感染患者的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:137-46. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.137.
4
Azithromycin, erythromycin and cloxacillin in the treatment of infections of skin and associated soft tissues. European Azithromycin Study Group.阿奇霉素、红霉素和氯唑西林治疗皮肤及相关软组织感染。欧洲阿奇霉素研究组。
J Int Med Res. 1991 Nov-Dec;19(6):433-45. doi: 10.1177/030006059101900602.
5
A comparative study of azithromycin and amoxycillin in paediatric patients with acute otitis media.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:73-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.73.
6
Comparative study of azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗下呼吸道感染的对比研究
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 May;10(5):437-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01968024.
7
Clinical comparative study of azithromycin versus erythromycin in the treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in children.阿奇霉素与红霉素治疗儿童急性呼吸道感染的临床对照研究
J Chemother. 1992 Dec;4(6):364-70. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1992.11739193.
8
Azithromycin in lower respiratory tract infections.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1992;83:26-33.
9
Azithromycin in upper respiratory tract infections: a clinical trial in children with otitis media.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1992;83:22-5.
10
Comparison of azithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with lower respiratory tract infection.阿奇霉素与克拉霉素治疗下呼吸道感染患者的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:153-62. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.153.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute sinusitis: guide to selection of antibacterial therapy.急性鼻窦炎:抗菌治疗选择指南
Drugs. 2004;64(8):805-19. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464080-00002.
2
Randomized double-blind study comparing 3- and 6-day regimens of azithromycin with a 10-day amoxicillin-clavulanate regimen for treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.一项随机双盲研究,比较阿奇霉素3天和6天疗程与阿莫西林-克拉维酸10天疗程治疗急性细菌性鼻窦炎的疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Sep;47(9):2770-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.9.2770-2774.2003.
3
Economic evaluation of antibacterials in the treatment of acute sinusitis.
抗菌药物治疗急性鼻窦炎的经济学评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Jan;15(1):97-113. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915010-00007.
4
Formulary management of macrolide antibiotics.大环内酯类抗生素的处方集管理
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Dec;8(6):491-512. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508060-00005.
5
Are amoxycillin and folate inhibitors as effective as other antibiotics for acute sinusitis? A meta-analysis.阿莫西林和叶酸抑制剂治疗急性鼻窦炎的效果与其他抗生素一样好吗?一项荟萃分析。
BMJ. 1998 Sep 5;317(7159):632-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7159.632.
6
Diagnosis and treatment of acute and subacute sinusitis in children and adults.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 1998 Spring-Summer;16(1-2):157-204. doi: 10.1007/BF02739329.
7
Prospective open randomized study comparing efficacies and safeties of a 3-day course of azithromycin and a 10-day course of erythromycin in children with community-acquired acute lower respiratory tract infections.一项前瞻性开放性随机研究,比较阿奇霉素3日疗程与红霉素10日疗程对社区获得性急性下呼吸道感染儿童的疗效和安全性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Dec;40(12):2765-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.12.2765.
8
Efficacy and safety of azithromycin versus phenoxymethylpenicillin in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis.阿奇霉素与青霉素V钾治疗急性上颌窦炎的疗效及安全性比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Nov;15(11):849-53. doi: 10.1007/BF01691214.
9
Multicentre comparative study of the efficacy and safety of azithromycin compared with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of paediatric patients with otitis media.阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗小儿中耳炎疗效和安全性的多中心比较研究
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 Aug;14(8):669-76. doi: 10.1007/BF01690872.
10
The new macrolides. Azithromycin and clarithromycin.新型大环内酯类药物。阿奇霉素和克拉霉素。
West J Med. 1994 Jan;160(1):31-7.