• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Azithromycin compared with cephalexin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.

作者信息

Mallory S B

机构信息

St. Louis Children's Hospital, Missouri 63110.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1991 Sep 12;91(3A):36S-39S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90400-r.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(91)90400-r
PMID:1656741
Abstract

This randomized, third-party-blinded study compared short-course therapy of once-daily azithromycin (500 mg on day 1, followed by 250 mg/day on days 2-5) with cephalexin (500 mg twice daily for 10 days) in the treatment of patients with skin and skin structure infections. At 25 centers, a total of 361 patients were entered into the study and 148 were evaluable for efficacy. The main causative pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes, were responsible for approximately two thirds of the infections in the two treatment groups. Clinical cure and improvement rates for the two treatments were comparable; 99% with azithromycin and 96% with cephalexin. On completion of therapy, both treatments had eradicated approximately 98% of pathogens. In general, both agents were well-tolerated. The results of this study show that a 5-day course of once-daily treatment with azithromycin is as effective as a 10-day course of twice-daily treatment with cephalexin in the management of skin and skin structure infections.

摘要

相似文献

1
Azithromycin compared with cephalexin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.
Am J Med. 1991 Sep 12;91(3A):36S-39S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90400-r.
2
Double-blind, double-dummy comparison of azithromycin and cephalexin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.阿奇霉素与头孢氨苄治疗皮肤及皮肤结构感染的双盲、双模拟对照研究
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Oct;10(10):880-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01975848.
3
Azithromycin, erythromycin and cloxacillin in the treatment of infections of skin and associated soft tissues. European Azithromycin Study Group.阿奇霉素、红霉素和氯唑西林治疗皮肤及相关软组织感染。欧洲阿奇霉素研究组。
J Int Med Res. 1991 Nov-Dec;19(6):433-45. doi: 10.1177/030006059101900602.
4
The role of cephalexin in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections.头孢氨苄在皮肤及软组织感染治疗中的作用。
Postgrad Med J. 1983;59 Suppl 5:43-6.
5
Comparison of azithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with upper respiratory tract infections.阿奇霉素与克拉霉素治疗上呼吸道感染患者的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:137-46. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.137.
6
A comparative study of the efficacy, safety and tolerance of azithromycin, dicloxacillin and flucloxacillin in the treatment of children with acute skin and skin-structure infections.阿奇霉素、双氯西林和氟氯西林治疗儿童急性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的疗效、安全性和耐受性的比较研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:103-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.103.
7
Multicenter evaluation of azithromycin and cefaclor in acute lower respiratory tract infections.阿奇霉素与头孢克洛用于急性下呼吸道感染的多中心评估
Am J Med. 1991 Sep 12;91(3A):31S-35S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90399-i.
8
Topical retapamulin ointment (1%, wt/wt) twice daily for 5 days versus oral cephalexin twice daily for 10 days in the treatment of secondarily infected dermatitis: results of a randomized controlled trial.局部应用瑞他帕林软膏(1%,重量/重量)每日两次,连用5天与口服头孢氨苄每日两次,连用10天治疗继发性感染性皮炎的随机对照试验结果
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Dec;55(6):1003-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.08.058. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
9
Treatment of staphylococcal skin infections: a comparison of cephalexin and dicloxacillin.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983 Feb;8(2):177-81. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(83)70020-4.
10
Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil, cephalexin and cefadroxil in the treatment of patients with primary infections of the skin or skin structures.头孢呋辛酯、头孢氨苄和头孢羟氨苄治疗皮肤或皮肤结构原发性感染患者的临床比较。
Dermatologica. 1991;183(1):36-43. doi: 10.1159/000247629.

引用本文的文献

1
Formulation and Evaluation of Azithromycin-Loaded Niosomal Gel: Optimization, In Vitro Studies, Rheological Characterization, and Cytotoxicity Study.载阿奇霉素脂质体凝胶的制剂与评价:优化、体外研究、流变学表征及细胞毒性研究
ACS Omega. 2022 Oct 25;7(44):39782-39793. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03762. eCollection 2022 Nov 8.
2
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing a penicillin or cephalosporin with a macrolide or lincosamide in the treatment of cellulitis or erysipelas.青霉素或头孢菌素与大环内酯类或林可酰胺类抗生素治疗蜂窝织炎或丹毒的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Infection. 2016 Oct;44(5):607-15. doi: 10.1007/s15010-016-0895-x. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
3
Interventions for impetigo.
脓疱病的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD003261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003261.pub3.
4
The effect of staggered administration of zinc sulfate on the pharmacokinetics of oral cephalexin.硫酸锌序贯给药对口服头孢氨苄药代动力学的影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Mar;73(3):422-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04098.x.
5
Azithromycin (zithromax).阿奇霉素(希舒美)。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1996;4(4):215-20. doi: 10.1155/S1064744996000415.
6
Macrolides: A Canadian Infectious Disease Society position paper.大环内酯类药物:加拿大传染病协会立场文件。
Can J Infect Dis. 2001 Jul;12(4):218-31. doi: 10.1155/2001/657353.
7
Formulations of antibiotics for children in primary care: effects on compliance and efficacy.基层医疗中儿童抗生素制剂:对依从性和疗效的影响。
Paediatr Drugs. 2002;4(5):323-33. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200204050-00005.
8
The new macrolides. Azithromycin and clarithromycin.新型大环内酯类药物。阿奇霉素和克拉霉素。
West J Med. 1994 Jan;160(1):31-7.
9
Phagocyte uptake and transport of azithromycin.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Oct;10(10):828-33. doi: 10.1007/BF01975835.
10
Azithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.阿奇霉素:抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及临床疗效综述
Drugs. 1992 Nov;44(5):750-99. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199244050-00007.