Lachance Laurie L, Houle Christy R, Cassidy Elaine F, Bourcier Emily, Cohn Jennifer H, Orians Carlyn E, Coughey Kathleen, Geng Xin, Joseph Christine L M, Lyde Michael D, Doctor Linda Jo, Clark Noreen M
Allies Against Asthma, Center for Managing Chronic Disease, University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2006 Apr;7(2 Suppl):44S-55S. doi: 10.1177/1524839906287066.
Evaluation designs assessing community coalitions must balance measures of how coalitions do their work and evidence that the coalitions are making a difference. The Allies cross-site evaluation attempts to determine the combined effects of the seven coalitions' work at the individual, organizational, and community levels. Principal components considered are (a) contextual factors of the coalition community, (b) coalition processes and structure, (c) planning and planning products, (d) implementation actions, (e) activities and collaborations, (f) anticipated intermediate outcomes, and (g) expected asthma related health outcomes. Measurements are quantitative and qualitative, and data generated by these methods are used as ends in themselves and as a way to confirm or inform other measures. Evaluation has been an integral part of the planning and implementation phases of the Allies coalition work, with a priority of involving all of the partners in conceiving of and deciding upon the elements of assessment.
评估社区联盟的评估设计必须在衡量联盟如何开展工作以及联盟正在产生影响的证据之间取得平衡。“联盟伙伴”跨站点评估试图确定七个联盟在个人、组织和社区层面的工作综合效果。所考虑的主要因素包括:(a)联盟社区的背景因素;(b)联盟流程和结构;(c)规划及规划成果;(d)实施行动;(e)活动与合作;(f)预期的中间成果;(g)与哮喘相关的预期健康成果。测量方法包括定量和定性,通过这些方法生成的数据本身既是目标,也是确认或为其他测量提供信息的一种方式。评估一直是“联盟伙伴”联盟工作规划和实施阶段的一个组成部分,优先事项是让所有合作伙伴参与评估要素的构思和决策。