Suppr超能文献

政策和制度变革与社区联盟:盟友对抗哮喘的成果。

Policy and system change and community coalitions: outcomes from allies against asthma.

机构信息

109 Observatory St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2010 May;100(5):904-12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.180869. Epub 2010 Mar 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We assessed policy and system changes and health outcomes produced by the Allies Against Asthma program, a 5-year collaborative effort by 7 community coalitions to address childhood asthma. We also explored associations between community engagement and outcomes.

METHODS

We interviewed a sample of 1477 parents of children with asthma in coalition target areas and comparison areas at baseline and 1 year to assess quality-of-life and symptom changes. An extensive tracking and documentation procedure and a survey of 284 participating individuals and organizations were used to ascertain policy and system changes and community engagement levels.

RESULTS

A total of 89 policy and system changes were achieved, ranging from changes in interinstitutional and intrainstitutional practices to statewide legislation. Allies children experienced fewer daytime (P = .008) and nighttime (P = .004) asthma symptoms than comparison children. In addition, Allies parents felt less helpless, frightened, and angry (P = .01) about their child's asthma. Type of community engagement was associated with number of policy and system changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Community coalitions can successfully achieve asthma policy and system changes and improve health outcomes. Increased core and ongoing community stakeholder participation rather than a higher overall number of participants was associated with more change.

摘要

目的

我们评估了“哮喘同盟”计划(该计划是由 7 个社区联盟合作实施的一项为期 5 年的项目,旨在解决儿童哮喘问题)带来的政策和制度变化以及健康结果,并探讨了社区参与度与结果之间的关联。

方法

我们在基线和 1 年时,对来自联盟目标地区和对照地区、患有哮喘的儿童的父母进行了抽样调查,调查内容包括生活质量和症状变化。我们通过广泛的跟踪和记录程序以及对 284 名参与个人和组织的调查,确定了政策和制度的变化以及社区参与水平。

结果

共实现了 89 项政策和制度的变化,包括机构间和机构内实践的变化以及全州立法。与对照组儿童相比,哮喘同盟儿童白天(P=.008)和夜间(P=.004)的哮喘症状更少。此外,哮喘同盟儿童的父母在感到无助、恐惧和愤怒(P=.01)方面的程度也有所减轻。社区参与的类型与政策和制度变化的数量有关。

结论

社区联盟可以成功地实现哮喘政策和制度的变革,并改善健康结果。核心和持续的社区利益相关者的更多参与,而不是更高的总体参与人数,与更多的变革有关。

相似文献

7
Integrating asthma prevention and control: the roles of the coalition.整合哮喘预防与控制:联盟的作用。
Health Promot Pract. 2006 Apr;7(2 Suppl):127S-138S. doi: 10.1177/1524839906287059.

引用本文的文献

2
Improving asthma self-management education through inhaler labeling.通过吸入器标签改善哮喘自我管理教育。
PEC Innov. 2024 Aug 5;5:100330. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100330. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Overweight women and management of asthma.超重女性与哮喘管理
Womens Health Issues. 2009 Sep-Oct;19(5):300-5. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
3
Negative affect, medication adherence, and asthma control in children.儿童的消极情绪、药物依从性与哮喘控制
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Sep;122(3):490-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.05.041. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
8
The impact of genetics and genomics on public health.遗传学和基因组学对公共卫生的影响。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2008 Jan;16(1):5-13. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201942. Epub 2007 Oct 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验