Clark Noreen M, Doctor Linda Jo, Friedman Amy R, Lachance Laurie L, Houle Christy R, Geng Xin, Grisso Jeane Ann
Center for Managing Chronic Disease, University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2006 Apr;7(2 Suppl):14S-22S. doi: 10.1177/1524839906287055.
There is a rich and extensive literature regarding coalitions as vehicles for amassing resources, influence, and energy in pursuit of a health goal. Despite insufficient empirical data regarding outcome, a number of observers have posited the aspects of coalition processes thought to lead to goal attainment. The supplement, which this article is part of, is devoted to an examination of how these elements fitted together (or did not) in the seven areas across the United States where Allies coalitions devoted themselves to achieving asthma control. The aim of this article is to present the theoretical bases for the work of the coalitions. It illustrates and emphasizes how the community context influenced coalition development, how membership was involved in and assessed coalition processes and structures, and the community-wide actions that were instituted and the capacities they were trying to strengthen.
关于联盟作为聚集资源、影响力和精力以追求健康目标的载体,已有丰富而广泛的文献。尽管关于结果的实证数据不足,但一些观察家提出了联盟过程中被认为能导致目标实现的各个方面。本文所属的增刊致力于研究这些要素在美国七个地区是如何(或未如何)组合在一起的,在这些地区,盟友联盟致力于实现哮喘控制。本文的目的是阐述联盟工作的理论基础。它说明了并强调了社区背景如何影响联盟发展、成员如何参与并评估联盟过程和结构,以及所采取的全社区行动和他们试图增强的能力。