Leach L S, Christensen H
Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra.
J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(3):122-9. doi: 10.1258/135763306776738558.
To assess the effectiveness of telephone-based interventions for mental illness, a systematic search of the literature was conducted using the databases PsycINFO and PubMed, and the search engine Google Scholar. The search identified 14 studies evaluating telephone-based interventions in the areas of depression (n = 6), anxiety (n = 3), eating disorders (n = 3), substance use (n = 1) and schizophrenia (n = 1). Although these studies provide evidence that telephone interventions can be effective, the few studies conducted, small sample sizes and lack of randomized controlled trial methodology prevent firm conclusions from being drawn. The articles reviewed suggest that an effective telephone intervention includes clearly structured therapy sessions and homework tasks. However, further evidence using large-scale, randomized controlled trials must be obtained in order to inform government and telephone counselling agencies about the efficacy of telephone interventions.
为评估基于电话的精神疾病干预措施的有效性,我们使用PsycINFO和PubMed数据库以及谷歌学术搜索引擎对文献进行了系统检索。检索发现了14项评估基于电话干预措施的研究,这些研究涉及抑郁症(n = 6)、焦虑症(n = 3)、饮食失调(n = 3)、药物使用(n = 1)和精神分裂症(n = 1)领域。尽管这些研究提供了证据表明电话干预措施可能有效,但所开展的研究数量较少、样本量较小且缺乏随机对照试验方法,这使得无法得出确凿结论。所审查的文章表明,有效的电话干预包括结构清晰的治疗课程和家庭作业任务。然而,必须获得更多使用大规模随机对照试验的证据,以便为政府和电话咨询机构提供有关电话干预效果的信息。