Cooney G, Jahoda A, Gumley A, Knott F
Section of Psychological Medicine, Division of Community Based Sciences, University of Glasgow, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006 Jun;50(Pt 6):432-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00789.x.
Mainstream schooling is a key policy in the promotion of social inclusion of young people with learning disabilities. Yet there is limited evidence about the school experience of young people about to leave mainstream as compared with segregated education, and how it impacts on their relative view of self and future aspirations.
Sixty young people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities in their final year of secondary school participated in this study. Twenty-eight individuals came from mainstream schools and 32 attended segregated school. They completed a series of self-report measures on perceptions of stigma, social comparison to a more disabled and non-disabled peer and the likelihood involved in attaining their future goals.
The majority of participants from both groups reported experiencing stigmatized treatment in the local area where they lived. The mainstream group reported significant additional stigma at school. In terms of social comparisons, both groups compared themselves positively with a more disabled peer and with a non-disabled peer. While the mainstream pupils had more ambitious work-related aspirations, both groups felt it equally likely that they would attain their future goals. Although the participants from segregated schools came from significantly more deprived areas and had lower scores on tests of cognitive functioning, neither of these factors appeared to have an impact on their experience of stigma, social comparisons or future aspirations.
Irrespective of schooling environment, the young people appeared to be able to cope with the threats to their identities and retained a sense of optimism about their future. Nevertheless, negative treatment reported by the children was a serious source of concern and there is a need for schools to promote the emotional well-being of pupils with intellectual disabilities.
主流学校教育是促进有学习障碍的年轻人融入社会的一项关键政策。然而,与隔离教育相比,即将离开主流学校的年轻人的学校经历,以及这种经历如何影响他们对自我的相对看法和未来抱负,相关证据有限。
60名处于中学最后一年的轻度至中度智力残疾的年轻人参与了本研究。28人来自主流学校,32人就读于隔离学校。他们完成了一系列关于耻辱感认知、与残疾程度更高和非残疾同龄人进行社会比较以及实现未来目标可能性的自我报告测量。
两组中的大多数参与者都报告在他们居住的当地遭受了耻辱性对待。主流学校组报告在学校还遭受了明显更多的耻辱。在社会比较方面,两组都将自己与残疾程度更高的同龄人和非残疾同龄人进行了积极的比较。虽然主流学校的学生有更远大的与工作相关的抱负,但两组都认为他们实现未来目标的可能性相同。尽管来自隔离学校的参与者来自明显更贫困的地区,并且在认知功能测试中的得分较低,但这两个因素似乎都没有对他们的耻辱经历、社会比较或未来抱负产生影响。
无论学校教育环境如何,这些年轻人似乎都能够应对对其身份认同的威胁,并对自己的未来保持乐观态度。然而,孩子们报告的负面待遇是一个严重令人担忧的问题,学校有必要促进智障学生的情绪健康。