Bolar D S, Levin D L, Hopkins S R, Frank L F, Liu T T, Wong E C, Buxton R B
Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, 92103, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 2006 Jun;55(6):1308-17. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20891.
Pulsed arterial spin labeling (ASL) techniques have been theoretically and experimentally validated for cerebral blood flow (CBF) quantification. In this study ASL-FAIRER was used to measure regional pulmonary blood flow (rPBF) in seven healthy subjects. Two general ASL strategies were investigated: 1) a single-subtraction approach using one tag-control pair acquisition at an inversion time (TI) matched to the RR-interval, and 2) a multiple-subtraction approach using tag-control pairs acquired at various TIs. The mean rPBF averaged 1.70 +/- 0.38 ml/min/ml when measured with the multiple-subtraction approach, and was approximately 2% less when measured with the single-subtraction method (1.66 +/- 0.24 ml/min/ml). Assuming an average lung density of 0.33 g/ml, this translates into a regional perfusion of approximately 5.5 ml/g/min, which is comparable to other measures of pulmonary perfusion. As with other ASL applications, a key problem with quantitative interpretation of the results is the physical gap between the tagging region and imaged slice. Because of the high pulsatility of PBF, ASL acquisition and data analysis differ significantly between the lung and the brain. The advantages and drawbacks of the single- vs. multiple-subtraction approaches are considered within a theoretical framework tailored to PBF.
脉冲动脉自旋标记(ASL)技术已在理论和实验上得到验证,可用于脑血流量(CBF)定量。在本研究中,使用ASL-FAIRER测量了7名健康受试者的局部肺血流量(rPBF)。研究了两种通用的ASL策略:1)在与RR间期匹配的反转时间(TI)使用一对标记-对照采集的单减法方法,以及2)在不同TI采集标记-对照对的多减法方法。采用多减法方法测量时,平均rPBF为1.70±0.38 ml/min/ml,采用单减法测量时约低2%(1.66±0.24 ml/min/ml)。假设平均肺密度为0.33 g/ml,这相当于约5.5 ml/g/min的局部灌注,与其他肺灌注测量结果相当。与其他ASL应用一样,结果定量解释的一个关键问题是标记区域与成像切片之间的物理间隙。由于PBF的高搏动性,肺和脑的ASL采集和数据分析存在显著差异。在针对PBF量身定制的理论框架内考虑了单减法与多减法方法的优缺点。