Chan Engle Angela, Chung Joanne W Y, Wong Thomas K S, Yang Joseph C S
School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Jun;15(6):661-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01345.x.
Like other health-care workers, Hong Kong nurses had their professional knowledge and skills seriously challenged during the SARS outbreak. Could current nursing practices support the care of SARS or SARS-like patients in the future? If not, alternative practices would be needed. Providing a preliminary understanding, this paper compares the conventional with different nursing delivery models in a simulated SARS ward and focuses on nurses' efficiency, infection control practices and views of the two models.
This study was conducted in three phases. First, a baseline understanding of nursing practices was achieved through four workflow observations. In an eight-hour day, four research assistants observed nursing activities in the medical and fever wards. These data were used in the second phase to construct two sets of clinical vignettes, pertaining to SARS patient care in both conventional and alternative practice models. These scripts were discussed with nine nurses of various ranks from the hospital under study for their expert validation and input. In the third phase, nurse participants and patient actors enacted the vignettes in a simulated setting. Video-taped observations and four nurse participant interviews were employed. Observational data were analysed through descriptive statistics and independent t-tests. Textual data were coded and categorized for common meanings.
Conventional practice from the findings consisted of cubicle and named nurse nursing. While the former reflected modified team and functional nursing, it did not confine patient care within a cubicle as suggested by its name. The latter depicted a modified primary nursing approach in a team, with delegation of care. Preliminary findings concerning infection control and nurse satisfaction revealed that the alternative model had an advantage over the conventional.
This study findings lay the foundation for clinical trials, which would evaluate the significance of patient-care quality, cost-effectiveness and better human resource management by restructuring current nursing practices.
与其他医护人员一样,香港护士的专业知识和技能在严重急性呼吸系统综合症(SARS)爆发期间受到了严峻挑战。当前的护理实践能否在未来为SARS或类似SARS的患者提供护理?如果不能,则需要其他替代实践。为提供初步认识,本文比较了模拟SARS病房中传统护理模式与不同护理提供模式,并重点关注护士的效率、感染控制实践以及对这两种模式的看法。
本研究分三个阶段进行。首先,通过四次工作流程观察对护理实践有了基线了解。在一天八小时的时间里,四名研究助理观察了内科和发热病房的护理活动。这些数据在第二阶段用于构建两组临床案例,分别涉及传统和替代实践模式下的SARS患者护理。这些脚本与来自研究医院的九名不同职级的护士进行了讨论,以获得他们的专家验证和意见。在第三阶段,护士参与者和患者扮演者在模拟环境中演绎这些案例。采用录像观察和对四名护士参与者进行访谈。观察数据通过描述性统计和独立样本t检验进行分析。文本数据进行编码和分类以找出共同含义。
研究结果显示传统实践包括单间护理和指定护士护理。前者反映了改良的团队护理和功能护理,但并不像其名称所暗示的那样将患者护理局限在一个单间内。后者描绘了团队中改良的初级护理方法,并进行护理委托。关于感染控制和护士满意度的初步结果表明,替代模式优于传统模式。
本研究结果为临床试验奠定了基础,临床试验将通过重组当前护理实践来评估患者护理质量、成本效益和更好的人力资源管理的重要性。