• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药学福利设计对医患关于费用沟通的影响。

The effect of pharmacy benefit design on patient-physician communication about costs.

作者信息

Shrank William H, Fox Sarah A, Kirk Adele, Ettner Susan L, Cantrell Clairessa H, Glassman Peter, Asch Steven M

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Apr;21(4):334-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00402.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00402.x
PMID:16686808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1484717/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incentive-based formularies have been widely instituted to control the rising costs of prescription drugs. To work properly, such formularies depend on patients to be aware of financial incentives and communicate their cost preferences with prescribing physicians. The impact of financial incentives on patient awareness of and communication about those costs is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between enrollment in incentive-based pharmacy benefit plans and awareness of out-of-pocket costs and rates of communication about out-of-pocket costs.

DESIGN

A matched telephone survey of patients and their primary care physicians.

SETTING

Los Angeles County.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand nine hundred and seventeen patients aged 53 to 82 (73% response rate).

MEASUREMENTS

Patient-reported pharmacy benefit design, knowledge of out-of-pocket costs, and discussion of out-of-pocket costs with physicians.

RESULTS

Sixty-two percent of patients who had prescription drug coverage and were aware of their pharmacy benefit design reported being enrolled in incentive-based plans. The majority of these (54%) were "never" or only "sometimes" aware of their out-of-pocket cost requirements at the time of the physician visit. After controlling for numerous physician and patient level variables, we found that patients enrolled in pharmacy benefit designs requiring no copayments were more likely to report they "never" discuss out-of-pocket costs with physicians compared with patients enrolled in incentive-based pharmacy benefit designs (81% vs 67%, P=.001) and patients with no prescription drug insurance (57%, P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Incentive-based pharmacy benefit plans and lack of insurance are associated with increased rates of discussions about out-of-pocket costs. Nonetheless, most incentive-based enrollees are unaware of out-of-pocket costs when prescriptions are written and never discuss out-of-pocket costs with their physicians, likely mitigating the effectiveness of financial incentives to guide decision making. Considering that out-of-pocket costs are associated with adherence to medical therapy, interventions to improve patient access to out-of-pocket cost information and the frequency of patient-physician discussions about costs are needed.

摘要

背景

基于激励措施的药品处方集已被广泛采用,以控制处方药成本的不断上涨。为了正常发挥作用,此类处方集依赖于患者了解经济激励措施,并与开处方的医生沟通他们对成本的偏好。经济激励措施对患者对这些成本的认知及相关沟通的影响尚不清楚。

目的

评估参与基于激励措施的药房福利计划与自付费用意识及自付费用沟通率之间的关系。

设计

对患者及其初级保健医生进行配对电话调查。

地点

洛杉矶县。

参与者

1917名年龄在53至82岁之间的患者(回复率73%)。

测量指标

患者报告的药房福利设计、自付费用知识以及与医生讨论自付费用的情况。

结果

有处方药保险且了解其药房福利设计的患者中,62%报告参加了基于激励措施的计划。其中大多数(54%)在看医生时“从未”或只是“有时”了解其自付费用要求。在控制了众多医生和患者层面的变量后,我们发现,与参加基于激励措施的药房福利计划的患者(81%对67%,P = 0.001)以及没有处方药保险的患者(57%,P < 0.001)相比,参加无需自付费用的药房福利设计的患者更有可能报告他们“从未”与医生讨论自付费用。

结论

基于激励措施的药房福利计划和缺乏保险与自付费用讨论率的增加有关。尽管如此,大多数参加基于激励措施计划的人在开处方时并不了解自付费用,也从未与他们的医生讨论过自付费用,这可能会削弱经济激励措施在指导决策方面的有效性。鉴于自付费用与坚持药物治疗有关,需要采取干预措施,以改善患者获取自付费用信息的机会,并增加患者与医生讨论费用的频率。

相似文献

1
The effect of pharmacy benefit design on patient-physician communication about costs.药学福利设计对医患关于费用沟通的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Apr;21(4):334-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00402.x.
2
Do the incentives in 3-tier pharmaceutical benefit plans operate as intended? Results from a physician leadership survey.三层药品福利计划中的激励措施是否按预期运作?一项医生领导力调查的结果。
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Jan;11(1):16-22.
3
Physicians' opinions about responsibility for patient out-of-pocket costs and formulary prescribing in two Midwestern states.中西部两个州的医生对患者自付费用责任和处方集开药的看法。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Oct;14(8):780-9. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.8.780.
4
Relationship of the use and costs of physician office visits and prescription drugs to travel distance and increases in member cost share.医生门诊就诊及处方药的使用和费用与出行距离及会员费用分担增加之间的关系。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Oct;12(8):665-76. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.8.665.
5
Physicians' perceived knowledge of and responsibility for managing patients' out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs.医生对管理患者处方药自付费用的认知及责任
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Sep;40(9):1534-40. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H158. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
6
Incentive formularies and changes in prescription drug spending.激励性药品目录与处方药支出的变化
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):360-9.
7
Consumer response to dual incentives under multitiered prescription drug formularies.消费者对多层级处方药处方集下双重激励措施的反应。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):353-9.
8
Physicians' perceptions of relevant prescription drug costs: do costs to the individual patient or to the population matter most?医生对相关处方药成本的看法:对个体患者的成本还是对总体人群的成本最为重要?
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Sep;12(9):545-51.
9
Employer drug benefit plans and spending on prescription drugs.雇主药物福利计划与处方药支出
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1733-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1733.
10
Benefit plan design and prescription drug utilization among asthmatics: do patient copayments matter?哮喘患者的福利计划设计与处方药使用情况:患者自付费用重要吗?
Front Health Policy Res. 2004;7:95-127. doi: 10.2202/1558-9544.1053.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of racial and ethnic inequities in copay card utilization and enrollment in copay adjustment programs.评估种族和民族在 copay 卡使用和 copay 调整计划参与方面的不平等现象。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Sep;29(9):1084-1092. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.23021. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
2
Where Do Real-Time Prescription Benefit Tools Fit in the Landscape of High US Prescription Medication Costs? A Narrative Review.美国高处方药费用背景下,实时处方效益工具的定位如何?一篇叙述性综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(4):1038-1045. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07945-z. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
3
Prevalence of Financial Considerations Documented in Primary Care Encounters as Identified by Natural Language Processing Methods.自然语言处理方法识别的初级保健就诊中记录的财务考虑因素的流行率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910399. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10399.
4
Patient-physician discussions about costs: definitions and impact on cost conversation incidence estimates.患者与医生关于费用的讨论:定义及其对费用对话发生率估计的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Mar 31;16:108. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1353-2.
5
Physician-patient communication on cost and affordability in asthma care. Who wants to talk about it and who is actually doing it.医患在哮喘护理方面关于费用和可负担性的沟通。谁想谈论这个问题,谁又真正在做呢?
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Dec;11(10):1538-44. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201408-363OC.
6
Perceived parent financial burden and asthma outcomes in low-income, urban children.城市低收入家庭中父母感知的经济负担与儿童哮喘结局
J Urban Health. 2013 Apr;90(2):329-42. doi: 10.1007/s11524-012-9774-7.
7
Entering and exiting the Medicare part D coverage gap: role of comorbidities and demographics.进入和退出医疗保险D部分的覆盖缺口:合并症和人口统计学特征的作用
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun;25(6):568-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1300-6. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
8
Primary medication non-adherence: analysis of 195,930 electronic prescriptions.主要药物不依从:195930 份电子处方分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Apr;25(4):284-90. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1253-9. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
9
Consumer awareness and strategies among families with high-deductible health plans.高自付额健康计划家庭的消费者意识和策略。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Mar;25(3):249-54. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1184-5. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
10
Cost-sharing and adherence to antihypertensives for low and high adherers.费用分担与低和高依从性抗高血压药物的使用。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Nov;15(11):833-40.

本文引用的文献

1
The implications of choice: prescribing generic or preferred pharmaceuticals improves medication adherence for chronic conditions.选择的影响:开具通用药物或首选药物可提高慢性病患者的用药依从性。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Feb 13;166(3):332-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.3.332.
2
Physician strategies to reduce patients' out-of-pocket prescription costs.医生降低患者自付处方费用的策略。
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Mar 28;165(6):633-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.6.633.
3
Do the incentives in 3-tier pharmaceutical benefit plans operate as intended? Results from a physician leadership survey.三层药品福利计划中的激励措施是否按预期运作?一项医生领导力调查的结果。
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Jan;11(1):16-22.
4
Shattuck Lecture: health care in the 21st century.沙塔克讲座:21世纪的医疗保健
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 20;352(3):267-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa045011.
5
Assessing the new medicare prescription drug law.评估新的医疗保险处方药法。
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Sep 7;141(5):391-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-5-200409070-00100. Epub 2004 Jul 12.
6
The health effects of restricting prescription medication use because of cost.因费用问题限制处方药使用对健康的影响。
Med Care. 2004 Jul;42(7):626-34. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000129352.36733.cc.
7
Pharmacy benefits and the use of drugs by the chronically ill.药房福利与慢性病患者的药物使用
JAMA. 2004 May 19;291(19):2344-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.19.2344.
8
Cost-sharing: patient knowledge and effects on seeking emergency department care.费用分担:患者知识及其对寻求急诊科护理的影响。
Med Care. 2004 Mar;42(3):290-6. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000114917.50457.52.
9
Provider perceptions of pharmacy management: lessons from the military health system.医疗服务提供者对药房管理的看法:来自军事卫生系统的经验教训。
Med Care. 2004 Apr;42(4):361-6. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000118862.92043.9b.
10
Patient cost-sharing innovations: promises and pitfalls.患者费用分担创新:前景与陷阱
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2004 Jan(75):1-4.