Otero Rafael, León Guillermo, Gutiérrez José María, Rojas Gustavo, Toro María Fabiola, Barona Jacqueline, Rodríguez Verónica, Díaz Abel, Núñez Vitelbina, Quintana Juan Carlos, Ayala Shirley, Mosquera Diana, Conrado Lesdy L, Fernández Diego, Arroyo Yobana, Paniagua Carlos A, López Mercedes, Ospina Carlos E, Alzate Claudia, Fernández Jorge, Meza Jazmín J, Silva Juan F, Ramírez Patricia, Fabra Patricia E, Ramírez Eugenio, Córdoba Elkin, Arrieta Ana B, Warrell David A, Theakston R David G
Programa de Ofidismo/Escorpionismo, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Dec;100(12):1173-82. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 May 12.
The efficacy and safety of two whole IgG polyvalent antivenoms (A and B) were compared in a randomised, blinded clinical trial in 67 patients systemically envenomed by Bothrops asper in Colombia. Both antivenoms were fractionated by caprylic acid precipitation and had similar neutralising potencies, protein concentrations and aggregate contents. Antivenom B was additionally treated with beta-propiolactone to lower its anticomplementary activity. Analysing all treatment regimens together, there were no significant differences between the two antivenoms (A=34 patients; B=33 patients) in the time taken to reverse venom-induced bleeding and coagulopathy, to restore physiological fibrinogen concentrations and to clear serum venom antigenaemia. Blood coagulability was restored within 6-24 h in 97% of patients, all of whom had normal coagulation and plasma fibrinogen levels 48 h after the start of antivenom treatment. Two patients (3.0%) had recurrent coagulopathy and eight patients suffered recurrence of antigenaemia within 72 h of treatment. None of the dosage regimens of either antivenom used guaranteed resolution of venom-induced coagulopathy within 6 h, nor did they prevent recurrences. A further dose of antivenom at 6 h also did not guarantee resolution of coagulopathy within 12-24 h in all patients. The incidence of early adverse reactions (all mild) was similar for both antivenoms (15% and 24%; P>0.05).
在哥伦比亚对67例被矛头蝮蛇全身中毒的患者进行的一项随机、双盲临床试验中,比较了两种全IgG多价抗蛇毒血清(A和B)的疗效和安全性。两种抗蛇毒血清均通过辛酸沉淀法进行分级分离,具有相似的中和效力、蛋白质浓度和聚集物含量。抗蛇毒血清B还经过β-丙内酯处理以降低其抗补体活性。综合分析所有治疗方案,在逆转蛇毒引起的出血和凝血障碍、恢复生理纤维蛋白原浓度以及清除血清蛇毒抗原血症所需的时间方面,两种抗蛇毒血清(A组34例患者;B组33例患者)之间没有显著差异。97%的患者在6 - 24小时内恢复了血液凝固性,所有患者在抗蛇毒血清治疗开始后48小时凝血和血浆纤维蛋白原水平均正常。两名患者(3.0%)出现复发性凝血障碍,八名患者在治疗后72小时内出现抗原血症复发。所使用的两种抗蛇毒血清的任何剂量方案都不能保证在6小时内解决蛇毒引起的凝血障碍,也不能预防复发。在6小时时再注射一剂抗蛇毒血清也不能保证所有患者在12 - 24小时内解决凝血障碍。两种抗蛇毒血清早期不良反应的发生率相似(分别为15%和