Suppr超能文献

适应性伺服通气与无效腔:对中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停的影响。

Adaptive servo-ventilation and deadspace: effects on central sleep apnoea.

作者信息

Szollosi I, O'Driscoll D M, Dayer M J, Coats A J, Morrell M J, Simonds A K

机构信息

Academic Unit of Sleep and Breathing, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

J Sleep Res. 2006 Jun;15(2):199-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2006.00515.x.

Abstract

Central Sleep Apnoea (CSA) occurs commonly in heart failure. Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) and deadspace (DS) have been shown in research settings to reverse CSA. The likely mechanism for this is the increase of PaCO(2) above the apnoeic threshold. However the role of increasing FiCO(2) on arousability remains unclear. To compare the effects of ASV and DS on sleep and breathing, in particular effects on Arousal Index (ArI), ten male patients with heart failure and CSA were studied during three nights with polysomnography plus measurements of PetCO(2). The order of the interventions control (C), ASV and DS was randomized. ASV and DS caused similar reductions in apnoea-hypopnoea index [(C) 30.0 +/- 6.6, (ASV) 14.0 +/- 3.8, (DS) 15.9 +/- 4.7 e h(-1); both P < 0.05]. However, DS was associated with decreased total sleep time compared with C (P < 0.02) and increased spontaneous ArI compared to C and ASV (both P < 0.01). Only DS was associated with increased DeltaPetCO(2) from resting wakefulness to eupnic sleep [(C) 2.1 +/- 0.9, (ASV) 1.3 +/- 1.0, (DS) 5.6 +/- 0.5 mmHg; P = 0.01]. ASV and DS both stabilized ventilation however DS application also increased sleep fragmentation with negative impacts on sleep architecture. We speculate that this effect is likely to be mediated by increased PetCO(2) and respiratory effort associated with DS application.

摘要

中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停(CSA)在心力衰竭患者中很常见。研究表明,适应性伺服通气(ASV)和死腔通气(DS)可逆转CSA。其可能机制是动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)升高至高于呼吸暂停阈值。然而,提高吸入二氧化碳分数(FiCO₂)对唤醒能力的作用尚不清楚。为比较ASV和DS对睡眠和呼吸的影响,特别是对唤醒指数(ArI)的影响,对10名患有心力衰竭和CSA的男性患者进行了为期三晚的多导睡眠图检查,并同时测量呼气末二氧化碳分压(PetCO₂)。干预措施(对照(C)、ASV和DS)的顺序是随机的。ASV和DS均使呼吸暂停低通气指数显著降低[(C)30.0±6.6,(ASV)14.0±3.8,(DS)15.9±4.7次/小时;P均<0.05]。然而,与对照相比,DS导致总睡眠时间减少(P<0.02),与对照和ASV相比,自发ArI增加(P均<0.01)。只有DS与从静息清醒到平稳呼吸睡眠期间的呼气末二氧化碳分压差值(DeltaPetCO₂)增加有关[(C)2.1±0.9,(ASV)1.3±1.0,(DS)5.6±0.5 mmHg;P = 0.01]。ASV和DS均能稳定通气,但应用DS也增加了睡眠片段化,对睡眠结构产生负面影响。我们推测,这种效应可能是由应用DS时呼气末二氧化碳分压升高和呼吸努力增加介导的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验