Rabinowitz Peter, Gordon Zimra, Chudnov Daniel, Wilcox Matthew, Odofin Lynda, Liu Ann, Dein Joshua
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Apr;12(4):647-52. doi: 10.3201/eid1204.051120.
We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature from 1966 to 2005 to determine whether animals could provide early warning of a bioterrorism attack, serve as markers for ongoing exposure risk, and amplify or propagate a bioterrorism outbreak. We found evidence that, for certain bioterrorism agents, pets, wildlife, or livestock could provide early warning and that for other agents, humans would likely manifest symptoms before illness could be detected in animals. After an acute attack, active surveillance of wild or domestic animal populations could help identify many ongoing exposure risks. If certain bioterrorism agents found their way into animal populations, they could spread widely through animal-to-animal transmission and prove difficult to control. The public health infrastructure must look beyond passive surveillance of acute animal disease events to build capacity for active surveillance and intervention efforts to detect and control ongoing outbreaks of disease in domestic and wild animal populations.
我们对1966年至2005年的科学文献进行了系统综述,以确定动物是否能为生物恐怖袭击提供早期预警、作为持续暴露风险的标志物,以及放大或传播生物恐怖疫情。我们发现,对于某些生物恐怖制剂,宠物、野生动物或家畜可以提供早期预警;而对于其他制剂,人类可能在动物出现疾病症状之前就已出现症状。急性袭击发生后,对野生动物或家畜群体进行主动监测有助于识别许多持续的暴露风险。如果某些生物恐怖制剂进入动物群体,它们可能通过动物间传播广泛扩散,难以控制。公共卫生基础设施必须超越对急性动物疾病事件的被动监测,建立主动监测和干预能力,以发现和控制家畜和野生动物群体中正在发生的疾病疫情。