• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predictors of patients' preferences for treatments to prevent heart disease.患者对预防心脏病治疗方法偏好的预测因素。
Heart. 2006 Nov;92(11):1651-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.072405. Epub 2006 May 18.
2
The myth of agency and patient choice in health care? The case of drug treatments to prevent coronary disease.医疗保健中自主性与患者选择的神话?以预防冠心病的药物治疗为例。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Nov;63(10):2698-701. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.008. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
3
Using personas to tailor educational messages to the preferences of coronary heart disease patients.利用人物角色根据冠心病患者的偏好定制教育信息。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Feb;53:100-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
4
What do patients really want? Patients' preferences for treatment for angina.患者真正想要的是什么?患者对心绞痛治疗的偏好。
Health Expect. 2008 Jun;11(2):137-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00482.x.
5
Expressed preferences for health education of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者对健康教育的表达偏好。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005 Dec;12(6):572-9. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000186621.75733.5c.
6
7
Influence of patient characteristics on doctors' questioning and lifestyle advice for coronary heart disease: a UK/US video experiment.患者特征对医生关于冠心病的问诊及生活方式建议的影响:一项英美视频实验
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Sep;54(506):673-8.
8
Good deaths, bad deaths, and preferences for the end of life: a qualitative study of geriatric outpatients.善终、恶终与临终偏好:老年门诊患者的定性研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Sep;50(9):1541-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50410.x.
9
Reasons underpinning patients' preferences for various angina treatments.患者对各种心绞痛治疗方法偏好的潜在原因。
Health Expect. 2004 Sep;7(3):246-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00282.x.
10
Gender preference and implications for screening colonoscopy: impact of endoscopy nurses.性别偏好及其对筛查结肠镜检查的影响:内镜护士的影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul 21;18(27):3590-4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3590.

引用本文的文献

1
The burden of chronic diseases and patients' preference for healthcare services among adult patients suffering from chronic diseases in Bangladesh.孟加拉国慢性病成年患者的慢性病负担和对医疗保健服务的偏好。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):3259-3273. doi: 10.1111/hex.13634. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
2
Patients' expectations of medicines--a review and qualitative synthesis.患者对药物的期望——一项综述与定性综合分析
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):179-93. doi: 10.1111/hex.12345. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
3
Patient factors influencing the prescribing of lipid lowering drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in UK general practice: a national retrospective cohort study.影响英国全科医疗中开具降血脂药物用于心血管疾病一级预防处方的患者因素:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 26;8(7):e67611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067611. Print 2013.
4
Decision tool to improve the quality of care in rheumatoid arthritis.改善类风湿关节炎护理质量的决策工具。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Jul;64(7):977-85. doi: 10.1002/acr.21657.
5
Patient and general practitioner attitudes to taking medication to prevent cardiovascular disease after receiving detailed information on risks and benefits of treatment: a qualitative study.患者和全科医生在接受关于治疗风险和益处的详细信息后对服用预防心血管疾病药物的态度:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jun 26;12:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-59.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinicians' preferences for treatments to prevent coronary heart disease: a postal survey.临床医生对预防冠心病治疗方法的偏好:一项邮寄问卷调查。
Heart. 2005 Mar;91(3):377-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.035196.
2
Patients' ideas, fears and expectations of their coronary risk: barriers for primary prevention.患者对自身冠心病风险的看法、担忧及期望:一级预防的障碍
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Nov;55(2):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.11.005.
3
Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight.理解风险的简单工具:从不懂数字到具备洞察力。
BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):741-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.741.
4
A strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease by more than 80%.一种将心血管疾病减少80%以上的策略。
BMJ. 2003 Jun 28;326(7404):1419. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1419.
5
Comparison of social distribution of immunisation with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine, England, 1991-2001.1991 - 2001年英格兰麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹疫苗免疫接种的社会分布比较
BMJ. 2003 Apr 19;326(7394):854. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7394.854.
6
Who decides when to start preventive treatment? A questionnaire survey to compare the views of different population subgroups.谁来决定何时开始预防性治疗?一项比较不同人群亚组观点的问卷调查。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Apr;57(4):241-2. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.4.241.
7
Are preventive drugs preventive enough? A study of patients' expectation of benefit from preventive drugs.预防性药物的预防效果足够吗?一项关于患者对预防性药物获益期望的研究。
Clin Med (Lond). 2002 Nov-Dec;2(6):527-33. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.2-6-527.
8
Resource implications and health benefits of primary prevention strategies for cardiovascular disease in people aged 30 to 74: mathematical modelling study.30至74岁人群心血管疾病一级预防策略的资源影响和健康益处:数学建模研究
BMJ. 2002 Jul 27;325(7357):197. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7357.197.
9
Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures.解释风险:将数值数据转化为有意义的图表。
BMJ. 2002 Apr 6;324(7341):827-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7341.827.
10
Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.阿司匹林用于心血管事件的一级预防:美国预防服务工作组的证据总结
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jan 15;136(2):161-72. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-2-200201150-00016.

患者对预防心脏病治疗方法偏好的预测因素。

Predictors of patients' preferences for treatments to prevent heart disease.

作者信息

Marshall T, Bryan S, Gill P, Greenfield S, Gutridge K

机构信息

Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Heart. 2006 Nov;92(11):1651-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.072405. Epub 2006 May 18.

DOI:10.1136/hrt.2005.072405
PMID:16709699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1861237/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relationship between expressed preferences for drug treatment to prevent coronary disease and several participant and general practitioner characteristics among patients attending coronary risk screening.

DESIGN

Face-to-face interviews with patients. At the first interview, a researcher asked participants to imagine six scenarios representing different levels of pretreatment five-year coronary risk. In each case they were asked whether they would choose treatment that would reduce their coronary risk by 30% of pretreatment risk. At the second interview participants were told their coronary risk and asked whether they would choose treatment. Sociodemographic variables were collected to investigate their relationship to patients' treatment preferences.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients identified as likely to be at high coronary risk were invited to attend for risk screening and to participate in the study.

SETTING

13 practices in the West Midlands.

RESULTS

Participants' preferences varied widely: at the first interview 112 (55.2%) of 203 participants preferred treatment at 3% five-year coronary risk but 31 (15.3%) preferred no treatment even at 30% five-year coronary risk. Age, sex, education and drug treatment history did not affect preferences, but lower social class was associated with preferring treatment at lower risk. Preferences expressed at the second interview were generally consistent with preferences at the first interview (kappa = 0.510, 95% CI 0.380 to 0.639).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients attending for coronary risk screening express stable preferences for drug treatment to prevent coronary heart disease. Their preferences vary widely and may be associated with social class.

摘要

目的

确定在接受冠心病风险筛查的患者中,对预防冠心病药物治疗的表达偏好与若干参与者及全科医生特征之间的关系。

设计

对患者进行面对面访谈。在首次访谈中,研究人员要求参与者设想六种代表不同治疗前五年冠心病风险水平的情景。在每种情况下,询问他们是否会选择能将冠心病风险降低至治疗前风险30%的治疗方法。在第二次访谈中,告知参与者其冠心病风险,并询问他们是否会选择治疗。收集社会人口统计学变量以调查其与患者治疗偏好的关系。

参与者

被确定为冠心病高风险的患者被邀请参加风险筛查并参与研究。

地点

西米德兰兹郡的13家医疗机构。

结果

参与者的偏好差异很大:在首次访谈中,203名参与者中有112名(55.2%)倾向于在五年冠心病风险为3%时接受治疗,但31名(15.3%)即使在五年冠心病风险为30%时也倾向于不接受治疗。年龄、性别、教育程度和药物治疗史不影响偏好,但社会阶层较低与倾向于在较低风险时接受治疗有关。在第二次访谈中表达的偏好通常与首次访谈中的偏好一致(kappa = 0.510,95%置信区间0.380至0.639)。

结论

接受冠心病风险筛查的患者对预防冠心病的药物治疗表达了稳定的偏好。他们的偏好差异很大,可能与社会阶层有关。