Griffiths Kathleen M, Nakane Yoshibumi, Christensen Helen, Yoshioka Kumiko, Jorm Anthony F, Nakane Hideyuki
Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia.
BMC Psychiatry. 2006 May 23;6:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-6-21.
There are few national or cross-cultural studies of the stigma associated with mental disorders. Australia and Japan have different systems of psychiatric health care, and distinct differences in cultural values, but enjoy similar standards of living. This study seeks to compare the nature and extent of stigma among the public in the two countries.
A household survey of the public was conducted in each country using similar methodologies. The Australian study comprised a national survey of 3998 adults aged over 18 years. The Japanese survey involved 2000 adults aged 20 to 69 from 25 regional sites distributed across the country. Interviewees reported their personal attitudes (personal stigma, social distance) and perceptions of the attitudes of others (perceived stigma, perceived discrimination) in the community with respect to four case vignettes. These vignettes described a person with: depression; depression with suicidal ideation; early schizophrenia; and chronic schizophrenia.
Personal stigma and social distance were typically greater among the Japanese than the Australian public whereas the reverse was true with respect to the perception of the attitudes and discriminatory behaviour of others. In both countries, personal stigma was significantly greater than perceived stigma. The public in both countries showed evidence of greater social distance, greater personal stigma and greater perceived stigma for schizophrenia (particularly in its chronic form) than for depression. There was little evidence of a difference in stigma for depression with and without suicide for either country. However, social distance was greater for chronic compared to early schizophrenia for the Australian public.
Stigmatising attitudes were common in both countries, but negative attitudes were greater among the Japanese than the Australian public. The results suggest that there is a need to implement national public awareness interventions tailored to the needs of each country. The current results provide a baseline for future tracking of national stigma levels in each country.
关于与精神障碍相关的污名化,很少有全国性或跨文化研究。澳大利亚和日本有着不同的精神卫生保健体系,文化价值观也存在显著差异,但生活水平相近。本研究旨在比较两国公众中污名化的性质和程度。
在每个国家采用相似方法对公众进行家庭调查。澳大利亚的研究包括对3998名18岁以上成年人的全国性调查。日本的调查涉及来自全国25个地区的2000名20至69岁的成年人。受访者就四个病例 vignettes 报告了他们个人的态度(个人污名、社会距离)以及对社区中他人态度(感知污名、感知歧视)的看法。这些 vignettes 描述了患有以下病症的人:抑郁症;伴有自杀意念的抑郁症;早期精神分裂症;以及慢性精神分裂症。
与澳大利亚公众相比,日本公众的个人污名和社会距离通常更大,而在对他人态度和歧视行为的认知方面则相反。在两国,个人污名均显著大于感知污名。两国公众都表现出,相较于抑郁症,对精神分裂症(尤其是慢性精神分裂症)有更大的社会距离、更强的个人污名和更高的感知污名。对于两国而言,几乎没有证据表明伴有或不伴有自杀行为的抑郁症在污名化方面存在差异。然而,对于澳大利亚公众来说,慢性精神分裂症的社会距离大于早期精神分裂症。
污名化态度在两国都很常见,但日本公众的负面态度比澳大利亚公众更强烈。结果表明,有必要实施针对各国需求的全国性公众意识干预措施。当前结果为未来追踪各国的全国污名化水平提供了基线。