• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在随机对照试验中,引导式自主决定可提高1型糖尿病患者的生活技能并改善糖化血红蛋白水平。

Guided self-determination improves life skills with type 1 diabetes and A1C in randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Zoffmann Vibeke, Lauritzen Torsten

机构信息

Institute of Public Health, Department of Nursing Science, University of Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.017. Epub 2006 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.017
PMID:16720089
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report 1-year results of newly developed method, guided self-determination (GSD), applied in group training (GSD-GT) for Type 1 diabetes patients with persistent poor glycaemic control.

METHODS

GSD was designed on the basis of qualitative research to help patients develop life skills with diabetes using worksheets filled in at home and coached by nurses in mutual reflection. We randomized 18-49-year-old adults at a Danish university hospital to either 16 h GSD-GT in 2001 or to similar training 1 year later.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

mean A1C> or =8.0% for at least 2 years, disease onset < or =40 years and insulin treatment from onset.

RESULTS

Thirty GSD-GT patients and 20 controls completed the study. GSD-GT patients did better than control patients in terms of (a) increased autonomy support perceived from health professionals (p<0.01); (b) higher frequency of self-monitored blood glucoses (p<0.001); (c) increased perceived competence in managing diabetes (p<0.01); (d) fewer diabetes-related problems (p<0.05); and (e) improved glycaemic control (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

GSD was effective in improving life skills with diabetes, including A1C, over a period of 1 year.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

GSD is a worthy candidate for further research. We consider it adjustable to people with type 2 diabetes and other chronic conditions.

摘要

目的

报告一种新开发的方法——引导式自主决策(GSD)在1型糖尿病血糖控制持续不佳患者的团体训练(GSD-GT)中的1年效果。

方法

GSD基于定性研究设计,通过患者在家填写工作表并由护士指导进行相互反思,帮助患者培养糖尿病生活技能。我们将丹麦一家大学医院18 - 49岁的成年人随机分为两组,一组在2001年接受16小时的GSD-GT训练,另一组在1年后接受类似训练。

纳入标准

至少2年平均糖化血红蛋白(A1C)≥8.0%,发病年龄≤40岁且自发病起接受胰岛素治疗。

结果

30名GSD-GT患者和20名对照组患者完成了研究。GSD-GT组患者在以下方面表现优于对照组患者:(a)从医护人员那里感受到的自主支持增加(p<0.01);(b)自我监测血糖的频率更高(p<0.001);(c)糖尿病管理方面的自我效能感增强(p<0.01);(d)糖尿病相关问题更少(p<0.05);(e)血糖控制改善(p<0.01)。

结论

在1年的时间里,GSD在改善糖尿病生活技能(包括糖化血红蛋白)方面是有效的。

实践意义

GSD是值得进一步研究的对象。我们认为它适用于2型糖尿病患者和其他慢性病患者。

相似文献

1
Guided self-determination improves life skills with type 1 diabetes and A1C in randomized controlled trial.在随机对照试验中,引导式自主决定可提高1型糖尿病患者的生活技能并改善糖化血红蛋白水平。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.017. Epub 2006 May 23.
2
Improving glycaemic control and life skills in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a randomised, controlled intervention study using the Guided Self-Determination-Young method in triads of adolescents, parents and health care providers integrated into routine paediatric outpatient clinics.改善 1 型糖尿病青少年的血糖控制和生活技能:一项使用青少年、父母和医疗保健提供者三方组成的小组,将指导自主决定-青少年方法整合到常规儿科门诊中的随机对照干预研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2011 Jun 14;11:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-55.
3
Guided self-determination-young versus standard care in the treatment of young females with type 1 diabetes: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial.引导式自主抉择——1型糖尿病年轻女性患者治疗中青少年组与标准治疗组的对比:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Nov 24;18(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2296-6.
4
The effect of guided self-determination on self-management in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus and HbA ≥64 mmol/mol: a group-based randomised controlled trial.引导式自主对1型糖尿病且糖化血红蛋白(HbA)≥64 mmol/mol患者自我管理的影响:一项基于群组的随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 3;7(6):e013295. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013295.
5
A person-centered education for adolescents with type 1 diabetes-A randomized controlled trial.以患者为中心的教育在青少年 1 型糖尿病患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验
Pediatr Diabetes. 2019 Nov;20(7):986-996. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12888. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
6
Effect of guided self-determination youth intervention integrated into outpatient visits versus treatment as usual on glycemic control and life skills: a randomized clinical trial in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.将引导式自主青年干预融入门诊就诊与常规治疗相比对血糖控制和生活技能的影响:一项针对1型糖尿病青少年的随机临床试验
Trials. 2014 Aug 12;15:321. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-321.
7
The effects of home monitoring by public health nurse on individuals' diabetes control.公共卫生护士进行家庭监测对个体糖尿病控制的影响。
Appl Nurs Res. 2006 Aug;19(3):134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.07.007.
8
A multicentre randomized controlled trial of an empowerment-inspired intervention for adolescents starting continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion--a study protocol.一项激励赋权干预在起始持续皮下胰岛素输注的青少年中的多中心随机对照试验——研究方案。
BMC Pediatr. 2013 Dec 20;13:212. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-212.
9
Self-care problems of adolescents with type 1 diabetes in southern Taiwan.台湾南部1型糖尿病青少年的自我护理问题
J Pediatr Nurs. 2007 Oct;22(5):404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2006.05.011.
10
Translating person-centered care into practice: A comparative analysis of motivational interviewing, illness-integration support, and guided self-determination.将以患者为中心的护理转化为实践:动机性访谈、疾病整合支持和引导式自我决定的比较分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Mar;99(3):400-407. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional distress as a therapeutic target against persistent poor glycaemic control in subjects with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review.将情绪困扰作为改善1型糖尿病患者持续血糖控制不佳的治疗靶点:一项系统综述
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Sep;27(9):4662-4673. doi: 10.1111/dom.16540. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
2
Fidelity of the Guided Self-Determination program in the MyHealth study during breast cancer follow-up.在乳腺癌随访期间,“我的健康”研究中引导式自我决定项目的保真度。
Acta Oncol. 2025 Feb 17;64:284-291. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42253.
3
Work ability following breast cancer - the MyHealth randomized controlled trial.
乳腺癌后的工作能力——MyHealth随机对照试验
Acta Oncol. 2025 Jan 8;64:34-39. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42221.
4
Prediabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: the effectiveness of a guided self-determination counselling approach in primary health care, a randomized controlled trial.糖尿病前期和心血管危险因素:初级卫生保健中引导自主决策咨询方法的有效性,一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):3035. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20538-1.
5
Youth Perspectives on 'Highly Personalised and Measurement-Based Care': Qualitative Co-Design of Education Materials.青年视角下的“高度个性化和基于测量的医疗照护”:教育材料的定性协同设计。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14137. doi: 10.1111/hex.14137.
6
Experiences of an interprofessional follow-up program in primary care practice.多专业团队在初级保健实践中的随访项目经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 23;24(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10706-9.
7
A Systematic Literature Review of Psychological Interventions for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病成人心理干预的系统文献综述
Diabetes Ther. 2024 Feb;15(2):367-380. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01513-2. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
8
Patients' experiences with participating in a team-based person-centred intervention for patients at risk of or diagnosed with COPD in general practice.患者参与基层医疗中针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病风险患者或已确诊患者的团队式以人为本干预措施的体验。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Sep 25;9(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01398-9.
9
Self-determination theory interventions versus usual care in people with diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.自我决定理论干预与糖尿病患者常规护理的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 6;12(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02308-z.
10
Feasibility and acceptability of an online guided self-determination program to improve diabetes self-management in young adults.一项在线引导式自主计划改善年轻成年人糖尿病自我管理的可行性和可接受性。
Digit Health. 2023 Mar 30;9:20552076231167008. doi: 10.1177/20552076231167008. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.