Scott Ian A, Ward Michael
Department of Internal Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD.
Med J Aust. 2006 Jun 5;184(11):571-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00383.x.
In the wake of findings from the Bundaberg Hospital and Forster inquiries in Queensland, periodic public release of hospital performance reports has been recommended. A process for developing and releasing such reports is being established by Queensland Health, overseen by an independent expert panel. This recommendation presupposes that public reports based on routinely collected administrative data are accurate; that the public can access, correctly interpret and act upon report contents; that reports motivate hospital clinicians and managers to improve quality of care; and that there are no unintended adverse effects of public reporting. Available research suggests that primary data sources are often inaccurate and incomplete, that reports have low predictive value in detecting "outlier" hospitals, and that users experience difficulty in accessing and interpreting reports and tend to distrust their findings.
鉴于昆士兰州班达伯格医院和福斯特调查的结果,有人建议定期公开发布医院绩效报告。昆士兰卫生部正在建立一个制定和发布此类报告的流程,由一个独立专家小组监督。这一建议的前提是,基于常规收集的行政数据的公开报告是准确的;公众能够获取、正确解读报告内容并据此采取行动;报告能够激励医院临床医生和管理人员提高护理质量;并且公开报告不会产生意外的不利影响。现有研究表明,主要数据源往往不准确且不完整,报告在检测“异常”医院方面预测价值较低,用户在获取和解读报告时遇到困难,并且往往不信任报告结果。