University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct 26;12:368. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-368.
The release of quality data from acute care hospitals to the general public is based on the aim to inform the public, to provide transparency and to foster quality-based competition among providers. Due to the expected mechanisms of action and possibly the adverse consequences of public quality comparison, it is a controversial topic. The perspective of physicians and nurses is of particular importance in this context. They are mainly responsible for the collection of quality-control data, and are directly confronted with the results of public comparison. The research focus of this qualitative study was to discover what the views and opinions of the Swiss physicians and nurses were regarding these issues. It was investigated as to how the two professional groups appraised the opportunities as well as the risks of the release of quality data in Switzerland.
A qualitative approach was chosen to answer the research question. For data collection, four focus groups were conducted with physicians and nurses who were employed in Swiss acute care hospitals. Qualitative content analysis was applied to the data.
The results revealed that both occupational groups had a very critical and negative attitude regarding the recent developments. The perceived risks were dominating their view. In summary, their main concerns were: the reduction of complexity, the one-sided focus on measurable quality variables, risk selection, the threat of data manipulation and the abuse of published information by the media. An additional concern was that the impression is given that the complex construct of quality can be reduced to a few key figures, and it that it is constructed from a false message which then influences society and politics. This critical attitude is associated with the different value system and the professional self-concept that both physicians and nurses have, in comparison to the underlying principles of a market-based economy and the economic orientation of health care business.
The critical and negative attitude of Swiss physicians and nurses must, under all conditions, be heeded to and investigated regarding its impact on work motivation and identification with the profession. At the same time, the two professional groups are obligated to reflect upon their critical attitude and take a proactive role in the development of appropriate quality indicators for the publication of quality data in Switzerland.
将急性护理医院的质量数据向公众发布,目的是为了告知公众、提供透明度,并在提供者之间促进基于质量的竞争。由于预期的作用机制和可能的公共质量比较的不利后果,这是一个有争议的话题。在这种情况下,医生和护士的观点尤为重要。他们主要负责收集质量控制数据,并直接面对公共比较的结果。这项定性研究的重点是发现瑞士的医生和护士对这些问题的看法和意见。研究的目的是探讨这两个专业群体如何评估瑞士发布质量数据的机会和风险。
为了回答研究问题,选择了定性方法。为了收集数据,在瑞士急性护理医院工作的医生和护士中进行了四次焦点小组讨论。对数据进行了定性内容分析。
结果表明,这两个职业群体对最近的发展持非常批评和消极的态度。感知到的风险主导了他们的观点。总的来说,他们主要关注的是:复杂性的降低、对可衡量质量变量的片面关注、风险选择、数据操纵的威胁以及媒体对已发布信息的滥用。另一个担忧是,给人的印象是质量这一复杂结构可以简化为几个关键数字,并且它是由一个错误的信息构建的,然后影响社会和政治。这种批评态度与医生和护士所具有的不同价值观体系和专业自我概念有关,而不是与市场经济的基本原则和医疗保健业务的经济方向有关。
瑞士医生和护士的批评和消极态度必须在任何情况下都得到重视,并对其对工作动机和对职业认同的影响进行调查。同时,这两个专业群体有义务反思他们的批评态度,并在为瑞士发布质量数据制定适当的质量指标方面发挥积极作用。