预测性注视线索与个性判断：眼睛应该让你信任吗？
Predictive gaze cues and personality judgments: Should eye trust you?
作者信息
Bayliss Andrew P, Tipper Steven P
机构信息
Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor, United Kingdom.
出版信息
Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;17(6):514-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01737.x.
Although following another person's gaze is essential in fluent social interactions, the reflexive nature of this gaze-cuing effect means that gaze can be used to deceive. In a gaze-cuing procedure, participants were presented with several faces that looked to the left or right. Some faces always looked to the target (predictive-valid), some never looked to the target (predictive-invalid), and others looked toward and away from the target in equal proportions (nonpredictive). The standard gaze-cuing effects appeared to be unaffected by these contingencies. Nevertheless, participants tended to choose the predictive-valid faces as appearing more trustworthy than the predictive-invalid faces. This effect was negatively related to scores on a scale assessing autistic-like traits. Further, we present tentative evidence that the "deceptive" faces were encoded more strongly in memory than the "cooperative" faces. These data demonstrate the important interactions among attention, gaze perception, facial identity recognition, and personality judgments.
尽管在流畅的社交互动中跟随他人的目光至关重要，但这种目光提示效应的反射性意味着目光可被用于欺骗。在一个目光提示程序中，向参与者展示了几张看向左边或右边的面孔。一些面孔总是看向目标（预测有效），一些面孔从不看向目标（预测无效），还有一些面孔以相等比例看向目标和看向别处（非预测性）。标准的目光提示效应似乎不受这些意外情况的影响。然而，参与者倾向于认为预测有效的面孔比预测无效的面孔更值得信赖。这种效应与评估自闭症样特征量表上的得分呈负相关。此外，我们提供了初步证据表明，“欺骗性”面孔在记忆中的编码比“合作性”面孔更强。这些数据证明了注意力、目光感知、面部身份识别和个性判断之间重要的相互作用。
Zotero 插件