Suppr超能文献

使用沿海环境水样对细菌水质指标测量方法进行比较与验证。

Comparison and verification of bacterial water quality indicator measurement methods using ambient coastal water samples.

作者信息

Griffith John F, Aumand Larissa A, Lee Ioannice M, McGee Charles D, Othman Laila L, Ritter Kerry J, Walker Kathy O, Weisberg Stephen B

机构信息

Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP), 7171 Fenwick Lane, Westminster, CA 92683, USA.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2006 May;116(1-3):335-44. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-7571-z.

Abstract

More than 30 laboratories routinely monitor water along southern California's beaches for bacterial indicators of fecal contamination. Data from these efforts frequently are combined and compared even though three different methods (membrane filtration (MF), multiple tube fermentation (MTF), and chromogenic substrate (CS) methods) are used. To assess data comparability and quantify variability within method and across laboratories, 26 laboratories participated in an intercalibration exercise. Each laboratory processed three replicates from eight ambient water samples employing the method or methods they routinely use for water quality monitoring. Verification analyses also were conducted on a subset of wells from the CS analysis to confirm or exclude the presence of the target organism. Enterococci results were generally comparable across methods. Confirmation revealed a 9% false positive rate and a 4% false negative rate in the CS method for enterococci, though these errors were small in the context of within- and among-laboratory variability. Fecal coliforms also were comparable across all methods, though CS underestimated the other methods by about 10%, probably because it measures only E. coli, rather than the larger fecal coliform group measured by MF and MTF. CS overestimated total coliforms relative to the other methods by several fold and was found to have a 40% false positive rate in verification. Across-laboratory variability was small relative to within- and among-method variability, but only after data entry errors were corrected. One fifth of the laboratories committed data entry errors that were much larger than any method-related errors. These errors are particularly significant because these data were submitted in a test situation where laboratories were aware they would be under increased scrutiny. Under normal circumstances, it is unlikely that these errors would have been detected and managers would have been obliged to issue beach water quality warnings.

摘要

30多个实验室定期监测南加州海滩沿线的海水,以检测粪便污染的细菌指标。尽管使用了三种不同的方法(膜过滤法(MF)、多管发酵法(MTF)和显色底物法(CS)),但这些监测工作所获得的数据经常会被汇总和比较。为了评估数据的可比性,并量化方法内部和不同实验室之间的变异性,26个实验室参与了一次相互校准活动。每个实验室使用其日常用于水质监测的一种或多种方法,对8个环境水样进行了三次重复检测。还对CS分析法中的一部分水井进行了验证分析,以确认或排除目标生物的存在。不同方法得出的肠球菌检测结果总体上具有可比性。验证发现,CS法检测肠球菌时的假阳性率为9%,假阴性率为4%,不过在实验室内部和实验室之间的变异性背景下,这些误差较小。所有方法检测粪大肠菌群的结果也具有可比性,不过CS法比其他方法低估了约10%,这可能是因为它只检测大肠杆菌,而不是MF法和MTF法所检测的更大的粪大肠菌群。相对于其他方法,CS法高估了总大肠菌群数几倍,并且在验证中发现其假阳性率为40%。相对于方法内部和方法之间的变异性,实验室之间的变异性较小,但这只是在纠正了数据录入错误之后。五分之一的实验室出现了比任何与方法相关的误差都大得多的数据录入错误。这些错误尤为严重,因为这些数据是在测试情况下提交的,而实验室当时知道自己会受到更严格的审查。在正常情况下,这些错误不太可能被发现,管理人员可能会被迫发布海滩水质警告。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验