Kamin Carol, Souza Kevin H, Heestand Diane, Moses Anna, O'Sullivan Patricia
Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Acad Med. 2006 Jul;81(7):632-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000232413.43142.8b.
To describe the current educational technology infrastructure and services provided by North American allopathic medical schools that are members of the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), to present information needed for institutional benchmarking.
A Web-based survey instrument was developed and administered in the fall of 2004 by the authors, sent to representatives of 137 medical schools and completed by representatives of 88, a response rate of 64%. Schools were given scores for infrastructure and services provided. Data were analyzed with one-way analyses of variance, chi-square, and correlation coefficients.
There was no difference in the number of infrastructure features or services offered based on region of the country, public versus private schools, or size of graduating class. Schools implemented 3.0 (SD = 1.5) of 6 infrastructure items and offered 11.6 (SD = 4.1) of 22 services. Over 90% of schools had wireless access (97%), used online course materials for undergraduate medical education (97%), course management system for graduate medical education (95%) and online teaching evaluations (90%). Use of services differed across the undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education continuum. Outside of e-portfolios for undergraduates, the least-offered services were for services to graduate and continuing medical education.
The results of this survey provide a benchmark for the level of services and infrastructure currently supporting educational technology by AAMC-member allopathic medical schools.
描述美国医学院协会(AAMC)成员中的北美全科医学医学院所提供的当前教育技术基础设施和服务,以提供机构基准所需的信息。
作者于2004年秋季开发并实施了一项基于网络的调查问卷,发送给137所医学院的代表,88所学校的代表完成了调查,回复率为64%。根据所提供的基础设施和服务对学校进行评分。使用方差分析、卡方检验和相关系数对数据进行分析。
根据学校所在地区、公立与私立学校或毕业班规模,所提供的基础设施特征或服务数量没有差异。学校实施了6项基础设施项目中的3.0项(标准差=1.5),并提供了22项服务中的11.6项(标准差=4.1)。超过90%的学校拥有无线接入(97%),在本科医学教育中使用在线课程材料(97%),在研究生医学教育中使用课程管理系统(95%)以及进行在线教学评估(90%)。服务的使用在本科、研究生和继续医学教育连续体中有所不同。除了本科生的电子档案袋外,提供最少的服务是针对研究生和继续医学教育的服务。
本次调查结果为AAMC成员的全科医学医学院目前支持教育技术的服务和基础设施水平提供了一个基准。