Bringman-Rodenbarger Lauren, Hortsch Michael
Department of Pathology University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor MI USA.
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor MI USA.
FASEB Bioadv. 2020 Mar 6;2(5):286-295. doi: 10.1096/fba.2019-00094. eCollection 2020 May.
Electronic learning resources are popular with today's students. However, how students choose their favorite e-learning resources is not well-understood. The popular histology self-review tool was offered in three different interfaces to students participating in two histology courses (Cell and Developmental Biology [CDB] 450/550 and DENT 510). These interfaces included PowerPoint files, an online website, and a mobile application (app). Identical in content, each interface had specific advantages and disadvantages with respect to compatible devices, user features, and access limitations. Upon the conclusion of the courses, students were surveyed about their interface preference, reasons for their selection, and general usage of the resource. With a 91.4% overall survey participation rate, only 3 out of 213 participating students never used the resource. Many students (46.3% CDB 450/550, 62.9% DENT 510) tried only one interface, with PowerPoint being the most popular final choice (56.5% CBD 450/550, 65.7% DENT 510). Although the interactive website and mobile app offered additional user-friendly features, they only garnered between 16% and 24% final popularity. "Convenience," "larger screen," and "easy to use" were most often reported as reasons for students' interface preference. The accessibility of where and when the resource can be used was also frequently cited. This availability encouraged some students to forgo other learning resources and to use the mobile app in distractive environments. The results of this study suggest that today's students are in fact less motivated to seek out high-tech e-learning resources than commonly believed and instead often select interfaces with which they are already familiar.
电子学习资源在当今学生中很受欢迎。然而,学生如何选择他们最喜欢的电子学习资源却尚未得到充分了解。向参加两门组织学课程(细胞与发育生物学[CDB]450/550和牙科学510)的学生提供了具有三种不同界面的流行组织学自我复习工具。这些界面包括PowerPoint文件、在线网站和移动应用程序(应用)。每个界面内容相同,但在兼容设备、用户功能和访问限制方面都有特定的优缺点。课程结束后,对学生进行了关于他们对界面的偏好、选择原因以及该资源的一般使用情况的调查。总体调查参与率为91.4%,213名参与调查的学生中只有3人从未使用过该资源。许多学生(CDB 450/550课程中有46.3%,牙科学510课程中有62.9%)只尝试了一种界面,PowerPoint是最受欢迎的最终选择(CDB 450/550课程中有56.5%,牙科学510课程中有65.7%)。尽管交互式网站和移动应用提供了更多用户友好的功能,但它们最终的受欢迎程度仅在16%到24%之间。“方便”、“屏幕更大”和“易于使用”是学生界面偏好最常提到的原因。该资源在何处以及何时可以使用的可及性也经常被提及。这种可用性促使一些学生放弃其他学习资源,并在容易分散注意力的环境中使用移动应用。这项研究的结果表明,当今的学生实际上寻求高科技电子学习资源的积极性不如普遍认为的那么高,相反,他们通常选择自己已经熟悉的界面。