J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):323-32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-323.
Auto-shaping the pigeon's key-peck response was examined as a respondent conditioning procedure with the use of Rescorla's truly-random control procedure. In the first experiment, pigeons received presentations of brief light on the response key and brief presentations of food where the light and the food were independently presented. All birds failed to key peck after many light and food presentations, but explicit pairing of the light and food rapidly conditioned pecking to the light. Experiment 2 showed that even when an independent light/food presentation schedule was reduced to variable-time 30 sec, additional naive birds would not key peck and only one bird pecked when the schedules were variable-time 15 sec. A third experiment examined an explicit-unpairing control procedure, where the light and food were not only presented on independent schedules but were also separated by a minimum time, and found that auto-shaping did not occur. A fourth experiment investigated a number of control procedures and found them ineffective. A fifth experiment investigated the effects of a physical separation of the locus of the response key and the food dispenser, and a sixth experiment investigated using a tone in place of the light. It was concluded that pecking is generated by auto-shaping procedures only when an intermittently presented keylight is regularly paired with food.
采用雷斯考拉的真正随机控制程序,将鸽子的啄键反应自动塑造为应答条件作用过程。在第一个实验中,鸽子的啄键和食物呈现是相互独立的,短时间的光刺激和短时间的食物呈现。在多次光和食物呈现后,所有的鸽子都不再啄键,但是,将光和食物明确配对,会迅速使啄键条件化。实验 2 表明,即使将独立的光/食物呈现时间表减少到可变时距 30 秒,额外的未受过训练的鸟也不会啄键,只有一只鸟在可变时距 15 秒时啄键。第三个实验检验了一个明确的非配对控制程序,其中光和食物不仅在独立的时间表上呈现,而且还被最小时间隔开,结果发现自动塑造并没有发生。第四个实验研究了多种控制程序,发现它们都没有效果。第五个实验研究了反应键和食物分配器的位置的物理分离的效果,第六个实验研究了用声音代替光的效果。结论是,只有当间歇性呈现的键光与食物有规律地配对时,啄键才是由自动塑造程序产生的。