Brainerd C J, Reyna V F, Estrada S
Department of Human Development, Cornell University, NY, Ithaca, USA.
Memory. 2006 Aug;14(6):672-91. doi: 10.1080/09658210600648449.
Our research was focused on a false-memory editing operation that is posited in fuzzy-trace theory-recollection rejection. The main objectives were (a) to extend model-based measurement of this operation to a narrative task that ought to ensure high levels of recollection rejection and (b) to study five manipulations that ought to influence recollection rejection by affecting the accessibility of verbatim traces of narrative statements: recency of narrative presentation, narrative repetition, type of false-memory item, testing delay, and repeated testing. The results showed that the narrative task did indeed yield high levels of recollection, with an estimated 49% of gist-consistent distractors being rejected in this way on initial memory tests. Consistent with current theoretical conceptions of false-memory editing, the results also showed that recollection rejection increased as a function of manipulations that should enhance the accessibility of verbatim traces of narrative statements, with repeated testing delivering especially large increases in verbatim accessibility.
我们的研究聚焦于模糊痕迹理论中提出的一种错误记忆编辑操作——回忆抑制。主要目标是：（a）将基于模型的该操作测量扩展到一个叙事任务中，该任务应能确保高水平的回忆抑制；（b）研究五种通过影响叙事陈述逐字痕迹的可及性来影响回忆抑制的操作：叙事呈现的近期性、叙事重复、错误记忆项目的类型、测试延迟和重复测试。结果表明，叙事任务确实产生了高水平的回忆，在初始记忆测试中，估计有49%与主旨一致的干扰项以这种方式被拒绝。与当前错误记忆编辑的理论概念一致，结果还表明，回忆抑制随着应增强叙事陈述逐字痕迹可及性的操作而增加，重复测试在逐字可及性方面带来了特别大的增加。
