Van Kleef Gerben A, De Dreu Carsten K W, Manstead Antony S R
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(1):124-42. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.124.
This study examined the social effects of emotions related to supplication and appeasement in conflict and negotiation. In a computer-simulated negotiation, participants in Experiment 1 were confronted with a disappointed or worried opponent (supplication), with a guilty or regretful opponent (appeasement), or with a nonemotional opponent (control). Compared with controls, participants conceded more when the other experienced supplication emotions and conceded less when the other experienced appeasement emotions (especially guilt). Experiment 2 replicated the effects of disappointment and guilt and showed that they are moderated by the perceiver's dispositional trust: Negotiators high in trust conceded more to a disappointed counterpart than to a happy one, but those with low trust were unaffected. In Experiment 3, trust was manipulated through information about the other's personality (cooperative vs. competitive), and a similar moderation was obtained.
本研究考察了在冲突与谈判中与祈求及安抚相关的情绪所产生的社会影响。在一项计算机模拟谈判中,实验1的参与者面对的是失望或担忧的对手(祈求)、内疚或懊悔的对手(安抚),或是无情绪的对手(对照组)。与对照组相比,当对方表现出祈求情绪时,参与者让步更多;而当对方表现出安抚情绪(尤其是内疚)时,参与者让步更少。实验2重复了失望和内疚的影响,并表明这些影响会受到感知者的性格信任的调节:高度信任他人的谈判者对失望的对手比对开心的对手让步更多,但信任度低的谈判者则不受影响。在实验3中,通过关于对方性格(合作型与竞争型)的信息来操纵信任,也得到了类似的调节作用。