Jackson Christine L, Colquitt Jason A, Wesson Michael J, Zapata-Phelan Cindy P
Department of Management, Krannert School of Business, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2076, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):884-99. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.884.
The 3 studies presented here introduce a new measure of the individual-difference form of collectivism. Psychological collectivism is conceptualized as a multidimensional construct with the following 5 facets: preference for in-groups, reliance on in-groups, concern for in-groups, acceptance of in-group norms, and prioritization of in-group goals. Study 1 developed and tested the new measure in a sample of consultants. Study 2 cross-validated the measure using an alumni sample of a Southeastern university, assessing its convergent validity with other collectivism measures. Study 3 linked scores on the measure to 4 dimensions of group member performance (task performance, citizenship behavior, counterproductive behavior, and withdrawal behavior) in a computer software firm and assessed discriminant validity using the Big Five. The results of the studies support the construct validity of the measure and illustrate the potential value of collectivism as a predictor of group member performance.
这里展示的三项研究引入了一种新的集体主义个体差异形式的测量方法。心理集体主义被概念化为一个多维结构，具有以下五个方面：对内群体的偏好、对内群体的依赖、对内群体的关心、对内群体规范的接受以及内群体目标的优先级。研究1在一组顾问样本中开发并测试了这种新的测量方法。研究2使用一所东南部大学的校友样本对该测量方法进行了交叉验证，评估了它与其他集体主义测量方法的收敛效度。研究3将该测量方法的得分与一家计算机软件公司中群体成员绩效的四个维度（任务绩效、公民行为、反生产行为和退缩行为）联系起来，并使用大五人格评估了区分效度。这些研究结果支持了该测量方法的结构效度，并说明了集体主义作为群体成员绩效预测指标的潜在价值。
