• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体和团队分析在人工社会智能中的心理理论支持

Individual and team profiling to support theory of mind in artificial social intelligence.

机构信息

Team Performance Laboratory, Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 2;14(1):12635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63122-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-63122-8
PMID:38825652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11144695/
Abstract

We describe an approach aimed at helping artificial intelligence develop theory of mind of their human teammates to support team interactions. We show how this can be supported through the provision of quantifiable, machine-readable, a priori information about the human team members to an agent. We first show how our profiling approach can capture individual team member characteristic profiles that can be constructed from sparse data and provided to agents to support the development of artificial theory of mind. We then show how it captures features of team composition that may influence team performance. We document this through an experiment examining factors influencing the performance of ad-hoc teams executing a complex team coordination task when paired with an artificial social intelligence (ASI) teammate. We report the relationship between the individual and team characteristics and measures related to task performance and self-reported perceptions of the ASI. The results show that individual and emergent team profiles were able to characterize features of the team that predicted behavior and explain differences in perceptions of ASI. Further, the features of these profiles may interact differently when teams work with human versus ASI advisors. Most strikingly, our analyses showed that ASI advisors had a strong positive impact on low potential teams such that they improved the performance of those teams across mission outcome measures. We discuss these findings in the context of developing intelligent technologies capable of social cognition and engage in collaborative behaviors that improve team effectiveness.

摘要

我们描述了一种旨在帮助人工智能培养对其人类队友的心理理论的方法,以支持团队交互。我们展示了如何通过向代理提供关于人类团队成员的可量化、机器可读的先验信息来支持这一点。我们首先展示了我们的分析方法如何能够捕获可以从稀疏数据中构建并提供给代理以支持人工智能心理理论发展的个体团队成员特征配置文件。然后,我们展示了它如何捕获可能影响团队绩效的团队构成特征。我们通过一项实验来证明这一点,该实验考察了在与人工智能社交智能 (ASI) 队友一起执行复杂团队协调任务时,影响临时团队绩效的因素。我们报告了个体和团队特征以及与任务绩效和自我报告的 ASI 感知相关的度量之间的关系。结果表明,个体和新兴的团队概况能够描述预测行为的团队特征,并解释对 ASI 的感知差异。此外,当团队与人类或 ASI 顾问合作时,这些配置文件的特征可能会以不同的方式相互作用。最引人注目的是,我们的分析表明,ASI 顾问对低潜力团队有很强的积极影响,以至于它们提高了这些团队在整个任务成果衡量标准上的表现。我们在开发能够进行社会认知并从事能够提高团队效率的协作行为的智能技术的背景下讨论了这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0431/11144695/e0ee0ec902bf/41598_2024_63122_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0431/11144695/a22d075ea1aa/41598_2024_63122_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0431/11144695/220ff3203fe2/41598_2024_63122_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0431/11144695/d38f66512aa9/41598_2024_63122_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0431/11144695/d6492c6008ac/41598_2024_63122_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0431/11144695/72b73f73de11/41598_2024_63122_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0431/11144695/e0ee0ec902bf/41598_2024_63122_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0431/11144695/a22d075ea1aa/41598_2024_63122_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0431/11144695/220ff3203fe2/41598_2024_63122_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0431/11144695/d38f66512aa9/41598_2024_63122_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0431/11144695/d6492c6008ac/41598_2024_63122_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0431/11144695/72b73f73de11/41598_2024_63122_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0431/11144695/e0ee0ec902bf/41598_2024_63122_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual and team profiling to support theory of mind in artificial social intelligence.个体和团队分析在人工社会智能中的心理理论支持
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 2;14(1):12635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63122-8.
2
Supporting Artificial Social Intelligence With Theory of Mind.用心理理论支持人工社会智能。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Feb 28;5:750763. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.750763. eCollection 2022.
3
Establishing Human Observer Criterion in Evaluating Artificial Social Intelligence Agents in a Search and Rescue Task.在搜索救援任务中评估人工社会智能体时建立人类观察者标准
Top Cogn Sci. 2025 Apr;17(2):349-373. doi: 10.1111/tops.12648. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
4
Towards Ethical AI: Empirically Investigating Dimensions of AI Ethics, Trust Repair, and Performance in Human-AI Teaming.迈向道德人工智能:实证研究人工智能伦理、信任修复以及人机协作中的表现维度。
Hum Factors. 2024 Apr;66(4):1037-1055. doi: 10.1177/00187208221116952. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
5
Implicit Coordination Strategies for Effective Team Communication.有效团队沟通的隐性协调策略
Hum Factors. 2016 Jun;58(4):595-610. doi: 10.1177/0018720816639712. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
6
Knowing me, knowing you: theory of mind in AI.知己知彼:人工智能中的心理理论。
Psychol Med. 2020 May;50(7):1057-1061. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000835. Epub 2020 May 7.
7
A Quantum-like Model of Interdependence for Embodied Human-Machine Teams: Reviewing the Path to Autonomy Facing Complexity and Uncertainty.具身人机团队的类量子相互依存模型:审视面对复杂性和不确定性的自主之路
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Sep 11;25(9):1323. doi: 10.3390/e25091323.
8
Augmenting team cognition in human-automation teams performing in complex operational environments.在复杂操作环境中执行任务的人机协作团队中增强团队认知。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007 May;78(5 Suppl):B63-70.
9
Team members' interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness: a catastrophic relationship?团队成员的互动焦虑与团队培训效果:一种灾难性的关系?
Hum Factors. 2015 Feb;57(1):163-76. doi: 10.1177/0018720814538814.
10
Ready to rumble: how team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance.准备好战斗:团队人格构成和任务冲突如何相互作用以提高绩效。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Mar;98(2):385-92. doi: 10.1037/a0029845. Epub 2012 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards fluid human-agent collaboration: From dynamic collaboration patterns to models of theory of mind reasoning.迈向灵活的人机协作:从动态协作模式到心理理论推理模型。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Aug 1;12:1532693. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1532693. eCollection 2025.
2
Artificial social intelligence in teamwork: how team traits influence human-AI dynamics in complex tasks.团队合作中的人工社会智能:团队特质如何影响复杂任务中的人机动态。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Feb 17;12:1487883. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1487883. eCollection 2025.
3
Digital humanistic program to manage premature frailty in young breast cancer survivors with gender perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming.与合成队友协作:对人机协作的深入了解。
Hum Factors. 2018 Mar;60(2):262-273. doi: 10.1177/0018720817743223. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
2
Technology as Teammate: Examining the Role of External Cognition in Support of Team Cognitive Processes.作为伙伴的技术:审视外部认知在支持团队认知过程中的作用
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 7;7:1531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01531. eCollection 2016.
3
Toward understanding social cues and signals in human-robot interaction: effects of robot gaze and proxemic behavior.
从性别视角出发管理年轻乳腺癌幸存者过早衰弱的数字人文项目。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jan 16;8(1):35. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01439-y.
理解人机交互中的社会线索和信号:机器人注视和空间行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 27;4:859. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00859. eCollection 2013.
4
Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs.计算并报告效应量以促进累积科学:t检验和方差分析实用入门指南
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.
5
Augmenting team cognition in human-automation teams performing in complex operational environments.在复杂操作环境中执行任务的人机协作团队中增强团队认知。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007 May;78(5 Suppl):B63-70.
6
Psychological collectivism: a measurement validation and linkage to group member performance.心理集体主义:一种测量验证及其与团队成员绩效的关联
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):884-99. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.884.
7
Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or asperger syndrome.心理理论的另一项高级测试:来自高功能自闭症或阿斯伯格综合征成年人的证据。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997 Oct;38(7):813-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01599.x.