Nathan James A, Pearce Linda, Field Carol, Dotesio-Eyres Nina, Sharples Linda D, Cafferty Fay, Laroche Clare M
Department of Respiratory Medicine, West Suffolk Hospital NHS Trust, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP33 2QZ, UK.
Chest. 2006 Jul;130(1):51-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.1.51.
To evaluate whether follow-up of patients recently discharged from the hospital as a result of acute asthma can be adequately provided by a respiratory specialist nurse compared to a respiratory doctor.
Single center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
District general hospital in the United Kingdom.
One hundred fifty-four of 373 eligible patients admitted with acute asthma were enrolled into the study from October 2000 to October 2003. All patients > 16 years of age were eligible for the study. Patients with COPD were excluded.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive an initial 30-min follow-up clinic appointment within 2 weeks of hospital discharge with either a specialist nurse or respiratory doctor. This comprised a medical review, patient education, and a self-management asthma plan. Further follow-up was then arranged as was deemed appropriate by the corresponding doctor or nurse. All patients were asked to attend a 6-month appointment.
The primary outcome was the number of exacerbations within 6 months of hospital admission. Secondary outcome variables were change in peak flow, quality of life (using the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the Asthma Questionnaire 20 [AQ20]), and clinic attendance.
Outcome data were available for 66 patients in the doctor group and 70 patients in the nurse group. There was no difference in the number of patients with exacerbations in the nurse group compared to the doctor group (45.6% vs 49.2%; odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 1.71; p = 0.674). However, a significant proportion of patients in both groups had exacerbations despite hospital outpatient follow-up. There was no difference in quality of life (p = 0.285; mean difference, 0.78; 95% CI, - 0.64 to 2.19 for the AQ20; and p = 0.891; mean difference, 1.08; 95% CI, - 5.05 to 7.21 for SGRQ) or change in peak flow (mean difference between nurse and doctor groups, 1.39 (95% CI, - 3.84 to 6.63; p = 0.122) at 6 months.
Follow-up care by a nurse specialist for patients admitted with acute asthma can be delivered equivocally with comparable safety and effectiveness to that given by a doctor.
评估与呼吸科医生相比,呼吸专科护士能否为近期因急性哮喘出院的患者提供充分的随访。
单中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。
英国的地区综合医院。
2000年10月至2003年10月期间,373例符合条件的急性哮喘入院患者中有154例纳入研究。所有年龄大于16岁的患者均符合研究条件。慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者被排除。
患者被随机分配在出院后2周内接受由专科护士或呼吸科医生进行的为期30分钟的初始随访门诊预约。这包括医学评估、患者教育和自我管理哮喘计划。然后由相应的医生或护士根据情况安排进一步随访。所有患者均被要求参加6个月后的预约。
主要结局是入院后6个月内的急性加重次数。次要结局变量包括呼气峰值流速的变化、生活质量(使用圣乔治呼吸问卷[SGRQ]和哮喘问卷20[AQ20])以及门诊就诊情况。
医生组66例患者和护士组70例患者有结局数据。与医生组相比,护士组急性加重患者的数量无差异(45.6%对49.2%;比值比,0.86;95%置信区间[CI],0.44至1.71;p = 0.674)。然而,尽管有医院门诊随访,两组中仍有相当比例的患者出现急性加重。6个月时,生活质量(p = 0.285;平均差异,0.78;AQ20的95%CI,-0.64至2.19;SGRQ的p = 0.891;平均差异,1.08;95%CI,-5.05至7.21)或呼气峰值流速变化(护士组与医生组的平均差异,1.39(95%CI,-3.84至6.63;p = 0.122))无差异。
对于因急性哮喘入院的患者,专科护士进行的随访护理在安全性和有效性方面与医生提供的护理相当。