Suppr超能文献

长时间入住重症监护病房后的结局与功能能力

Outcome and functional capacity after prolonged intensive care unit stay.

作者信息

Delle Karth Georg, Meyer Brigitte, Bauer Sabine, Nikfardjam Mariam, Heinz Gottfried

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Intensive Care Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2006 Jul;118(13-14):390-6. doi: 10.1007/s00508-006-0616-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An important proportion of critically ill patients who survives their acute illness remains in a critical state requiring intensive care management for weeks to months. Nevertheless, data on risk factors for in-hospital mortality and especially for long-term mortality and functional capacity are scarce. This study investigated outcome and prognostic factors in long-term critically ill patients.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study was performed at our mixed adult 8-bed cardiologic ICU at a 2200-bed University Hospital. Patient data from our local database connected to an Austrian multicenter program for quality assurance in intensive care were analyzed. Data were collected between March 1(st), 1998 and December 31(st), 2003. Patients with an ICU stay > or =30 days formed the long-term study group. Morbidity and functional capacity were assessed using the Barthel mobility index in telephone interviews.

RESULTS

Patients spending > or =30 days in the ICU numbered 135 (10%) and occupied 5962 bed-days, representing 40.9% of the total bed-days. Compared with patients with an ICU stay <30 days, patients in the long-term group had a significantly higher SAPS II score during the first 24 hours after ICU admission (54 [IQR 41-65] vs. 38 [IQR 27-56], p < 0.001). There was a trend towards male preponderance in the long-term group (98/135 [82.6%] vs. 782/1215 [64.4%], p = 0.05). Differences in ICU and in-hospital mortality were not significant (28/135 (20.7%) vs. 295/1215 (24.3%), p = 0.620 and 46/135 [34.1%] vs. 360/1215 [29.6%], p = 0.285, respectively). After 12 and 48 months, the overall cumulative rates of death in hospital survivors were 14% and 26%, respectively in the short-term ICU group and 31% and 61% in the long-term group. A log-rank test revealed a significantly higher probability of survival in the short-term group after hospital discharge (log rank = 34.3, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of hospital survivors and non-survivors in the long-term group showed that the need for renal replacement therapy during the ICU stay was the sole independent predictor for in-hospital death and death within 1 year after ICU discharge (OR = 2.88; 95%CI 1.12-7.41, p = 0.028 and OR = 3.66, 95%CI 1.36-9.83, p = 0.01, respectively). In 28/31 long-term survivors (90%) in the long-term ICU group, the Barthel index indicated no or only moderate disability during daily activities.

CONCLUSION

Hospital mortality rates in critically ill patients with a stay <30 or > or =30 days were comparable. The necessity for renal replacement therapy was the sole independent predictor for in-hospital and 1-year mortality in long-term ICU patients. Critically ill patients with a stay > or =30 days have a high and ongoing risk of death after hospital discharge; however, a substantial number of these patients are long-term survivors with no or only moderate disability during daily activities.

摘要

背景

在急性疾病中存活下来的重症患者中有相当一部分仍处于危急状态,需要数周甚至数月的重症监护管理。然而,关于院内死亡率,尤其是长期死亡率和功能能力的危险因素的数据却很少。本研究调查了长期重症患者的预后及预后因素。

方法

本回顾性观察队列研究在一所拥有2200张床位的大学医院的8张床位的成人综合心脏病重症监护病房进行。分析了我们本地数据库中与奥地利重症监护质量保证多中心项目相关的患者数据。数据收集时间为1998年3月1日至2003年12月31日。在重症监护病房住院≥30天的患者组成长期研究组。通过电话访谈,使用Barthel活动指数评估发病率和功能能力。

结果

在重症监护病房住院≥30天的患者有135例(10%),占用床位5962天,占总床日数的40.9%。与在重症监护病房住院<30天的患者相比,长期组患者在重症监护病房入院后的头24小时内的简化急性生理学评分II(SAPS II)显著更高(54[四分位间距41 - 65]对38[四分位间距27 - 56],p<0.001)。长期组有男性占优势的趋势(98/135[82.6%]对782/1215[64.4%],p = 0.05)。重症监护病房死亡率和院内死亡率的差异不显著(28/135(20.7%)对295/1215(24.3%),p = 0.620;46/135[34.1%]对360/1215[29.6%],p = 0.285)。12个月和48个月后,短期重症监护病房组院内存活患者的总体累积死亡率分别为14%和26%,长期组为31%和61%。对数秩检验显示出院后短期组的存活概率显著更高(对数秩=34.3,p<0.001)。对长期组院内存活者和非存活者的多因素分析表明,重症监护病房住院期间需要肾脏替代治疗是院内死亡和重症监护病房出院后1年内死亡的唯一独立预测因素(OR = 2.88;95%置信区间1.12 - 7.41,p = 0.028;OR = 3.66,95%置信区间1.36 - 9.83,p = 0.01)。在长期重症监护病房组的28/31例长期存活者(90%)中,Barthel指数表明日常活动无残疾或仅为中度残疾。

结论

住院<30天或≥30天的重症患者的院内死亡率相当。肾脏替代治疗的必要性是长期重症监护病房患者院内和1年死亡率的唯一独立预测因素。住院≥30天的重症患者出院后有很高且持续的死亡风险;然而,这些患者中有相当一部分是长期存活者,日常活动无残疾或仅为中度残疾。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验