• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性对与选择性医疗程序相关的信息及并发症严重程度评级的偏好。

Women's preferences for information and complication seriousness ratings related to elective medical procedures.

作者信息

Coleman P K, Reardon D C, Lee M B

机构信息

Human Development and Family Studies, Bowling Green State University, 16D Family and Consumer Sciences Building, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2006 Aug;32(8):435-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014274.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2005.014274
PMID:16877620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2563388/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the preferences of patients for information related to elective procedures.

METHODS

A survey was carried out using a sample of 187 women. The majority of whom were on a low-income, who obtained obstetric or gynaecological services at St Joseph Regional Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, while they were in a waiting room.

RESULTS

Many of the complications, including those that are uncommon and less serious, were considered to be relevant to the medical decisions of most patients. Average seriousness ratings associated with complications of various elective procedures were in the range of moderate to high. A frequency of complications of 1:100 or higher would factor into most women's elective treatment decisions. Women indicated a preference for receiving as much or more information pertaining to complications associated with particular elective obstetric or gynaecological procedures as other elective procedures.

CONCLUSION

Most women wish to be informed of risks and treatment alternatives, rate many complications as serious, and are likely to use information provided to make elective treatment decisions.

摘要

目的

研究患者对择期手术相关信息的偏好。

方法

对187名女性进行了一项调查。其中大多数人收入较低,她们在威斯康星州密尔沃基市的圣约瑟夫地区医疗中心的候诊室接受产科或妇科服务时参与了调查。

结果

许多并发症,包括那些不常见且不太严重的并发症,被认为与大多数患者的医疗决策相关。各种择期手术并发症的平均严重程度评级为中度到高度。并发症发生率为1:100或更高会影响大多数女性的择期治疗决策。女性表示,她们希望获得与特定产科或妇科择期手术并发症相关的信息,其数量与其他择期手术的相关信息一样多或更多。

结论

大多数女性希望了解风险和治疗选择,将许多并发症视为严重情况,并且可能会利用所提供的信息来做出择期治疗决策。

相似文献

1
Women's preferences for information and complication seriousness ratings related to elective medical procedures.女性对与选择性医疗程序相关的信息及并发症严重程度评级的偏好。
J Med Ethics. 2006 Aug;32(8):435-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014274.
2
Patient education to reduce elective labor inductions.患者教育以减少选择性引产。
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):188-94; quiz 195-6. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0b013e3181d9c6d6.
3
How much influence do women in Sweden have on caesarean section? A follow-up study of women's preferences in early pregnancy.瑞典女性对剖宫产有多大影响?一项关于女性孕早期偏好的随访研究。
Midwifery. 2008 Mar;24(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.07.007. Epub 2006 Dec 29.
4
Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.背后的真相——在不存在医学或产科因素的情况下,很少有女性选择剖宫产。
Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):620-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
5
Women's perceptions of their treatment decision-making about breast cancer treatment.女性对其乳腺癌治疗决策的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):431-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.015. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
6
Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: A qualitative study.既往有剖宫产史孕妇分娩方式的决策:一项定性研究。
BJOG. 2007 Jan;114(1):86-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01154.x.
7
Number of antenatal visits and women's opinion.产前检查次数及女性的看法。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Mar;84(3):248-54. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00615.x.
8
Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean.剖宫产术后知情分娩决策辅助工具的随机对照试验:为分娩做出选择
Birth. 2005 Dec;32(4):252-61. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00383.x.
9
An informed decision? Breast cancer patients and their knowledge about treatment.明智的决定?乳腺癌患者及其对治疗的了解。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):303-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
10
Informed consent for elective and emergency surgery: questionnaire study.择期手术和急诊手术的知情同意:问卷调查研究
BJOG. 2004 Oct;111(10):1133-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00240.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities.堕胎与心理健康争议:关于共识、分歧、可行建议及研究机会的全面文献综述
SAGE Open Med. 2018 Oct 29;6:2050312118807624. doi: 10.1177/2050312118807624. eCollection 2018.
2
Gender and Racial Characteristics of Patients Referred to a Tertiary Atrial Fibrillation Center.转诊至三级房颤中心患者的性别和种族特征。
J Atr Fibrillation. 2010 Dec 15;3(4):301. doi: 10.4022/jafib.301. eCollection 2010 Dec.
3
Design and national dissemination of the StrongWomen Community Strength Training Program.“强壮女性”社区力量训练项目的设计与全国推广。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jan;5(1):A25. Epub 2007 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving patient safety through informatics tools for shared decision making and risk communication.通过用于共同决策和风险沟通的信息学工具提高患者安全。
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Aug;73(7-8):551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.05.003.
2
Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.关于筛查和化学预防的共同决策。美国预防服务工作组的建议方法。
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Jan;26(1):56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.011.
3
Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice.用于促进门诊实践中共同决策的健康决策辅助工具。
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jan 15;136(2):127-35. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-2-200201150-00010.
4
Assessing values for health: numeracy matters.评估健康价值:算术能力很重要。
Med Decis Making. 2001 Sep-Oct;21(5):382-90. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0102100505.
5
Preparatory education for informed decision-making in prostate cancer early detection and treatment.前列腺癌早期检测与治疗中进行明智决策的预备教育。
Semin Urol Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(3):172-7.
6
Risk communication in clinical practice: putting cancer in context.临床实践中的风险沟通:将癌症置于背景中考虑。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999(25):124-33. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024187.
7
Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?患者对医疗决策的偏好:究竟谁真正想要参与?
Med Care. 2000 Mar;38(3):335-41. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200003000-00010.
8
Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys.患者参与临床决策的偏好:已发表调查的综述
Behav Med. 1998 Summer;24(2):81-8. doi: 10.1080/08964289809596384.
9
Patient desire for information and decision making in health care decisions: the Autonomy Preference Index and the Health Opinion Survey.患者对医疗保健决策中信息获取与决策制定的需求:自主偏好指数与健康意见调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Nov;10(11):593-600. doi: 10.1007/BF02602742.
10
Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.衡量患者对自主权的渴望:医疗患者的决策与信息寻求偏好
J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;4(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02596485.