• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高手术风险患者的颈动脉支架置入术:ARCHeR研究结果

Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results.

作者信息

Gray William A, Hopkins L Nelson, Yadav Sanjay, Davis Thomas, Wholey Mark, Atkinson Richard, Cremonesi Alberto, Fairman Ronald, Walker Gary, Verta Patrick, Popma Jeff, Virmani Renu, Cohen David J

机构信息

Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2006 Aug;44(2):258-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.044.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.044
PMID:16890850
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy is the standard of care for most patients with severe extracranial carotid bifurcation disease. However, its safety and efficacy in patients with significant surgical risk are unclear. The ARCHeR (ACCULINK for Revascularization of Carotids in High-Risk patients) trial was performed to determine whether carotid artery stenting with embolic protection is a safe and effective alternative to endarterectomy in high-surgical-risk patients.

METHODS

The ARCHeR trial is a series of three sequential, multicenter, nonrandomized, prospective studies. Forty-eight sites enrolled 581 high-surgical-risk patients between May 2000 and September 2003. Patients with severe carotid artery stenosis (angiographically defined, symptomatic > or =50%, or asymptomatic > or =80%) had an ACCULINK nitinol stent implanted. The ACCUNET filter embolic protection system was added to the procedure in the final 2 studies (422 patients). The primary efficacy end point was a composite of periprocedural (< or =30 days) death, stroke, and myocardial infarction, plus ipsilateral stroke between days 31 and 365.

RESULTS

The 30-day rate of death/stroke/myocardial infarction was 8.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2%-10.8%), and that of stroke/death was 6.9% (95% CI, 5.0%-9.3%). Most (23/32) strokes were minor, of which more than half (12/23) returned to baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores within 30 days. The 30-day major/fatal stroke rate was 1.5% (95% CI, 0.7%-2.9%). No hemorrhagic strokes were observed in the study. Ipsilateral cerebrovascular accident occurred in 1.3% between 30 days and 1 year, thus giving a primary composite end point of 30-day death/stroke/myocardial infarction plus ipsilateral stroke at 1 year of 9.6% (95% CI, 7.2%-12.0%), which is below the 14.4% historical control comparator. Target lesion revascularization at 12 months and 2 years was 2.2% and 2.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ARCHeR results demonstrate that extracranial carotid artery stenting with embolic filter protection is not inferior to historical results of endarterectomy and suggest that carotid artery stenting is a safe, durable, and effective alternative in high-surgical-risk patients.

摘要

背景

颈动脉内膜切除术是大多数重度颅外颈动脉分叉病变患者的标准治疗方法。然而,其在手术风险较高患者中的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。开展ARCHeR(高危患者颈动脉血运重建的ACCULINK)试验以确定在高手术风险患者中,使用栓子保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术是否是一种安全有效的替代内膜切除术的方法。

方法

ARCHeR试验是一系列连续的三项多中心、非随机、前瞻性研究。在2000年5月至2003年9月期间,48个研究点纳入了581例高手术风险患者。患有严重颈动脉狭窄(血管造影定义为,有症状的≥50%,或无症状的≥80%)的患者植入了ACCULINK镍钛合金支架。在最后两项研究(422例患者)中,手术过程中增加了ACCUNET滤器栓子保护系统。主要疗效终点是围手术期(≤30天)死亡、卒中、心肌梗死的复合终点,加上第31天至365天之间的同侧卒中。

结果

30天死亡/卒中/心肌梗死发生率为8.3%(95%置信区间[CI],6.2%-10.8%),卒中/死亡发生率为6.9%(95%CI,5.0%-9.3%)。大多数(23/32)卒中为轻度,其中超过一半(12/23)在30天内恢复至美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表基线评分。30天严重/致死性卒中发生率为1.5%(95%CI,0.7%-2.9%)。研究中未观察到出血性卒中。30天至1年之间同侧脑血管意外发生率为1.3%,因此30天死亡/卒中/心肌梗死加上1年时同侧卒中的主要复合终点为9.6%(95%CI,7.2%-12.0%),低于14.4%的历史对照比较值。12个月和2年时的靶病变血运重建率分别为2.2%和2.9%。

结论

ARCHeR试验结果表明,使用栓子滤器保护的颅外颈动脉支架置入术并不逊于内膜切除术的历史结果,并提示在高手术风险患者中,颈动脉支架置入术是一种安全、持久且有效的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results.高手术风险患者的颈动脉支架置入术:ARCHeR研究结果
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Aug;44(2):258-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.044.
2
Carotid artery revascularization in high surgical risk patients with the NexStent and the Filterwire EX/EZ: 1-year results in the CABERNET trial.使用NexStent和Filterwire EX/EZ对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉血管重建术:CABERNET试验的1年结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jun 1;71(7):950-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21564.
3
Carotid Revascularization Using Endarterectomy or Stenting Systems (CaRESS) phase I clinical trial: 1-year results.使用颈动脉内膜切除术或支架系统的颈动脉血运重建术(CaRESS)I期临床试验:1年结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Aug;42(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.04.023.
4
The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting.CAPTURE注册研究:早期批准后使用栓子保护装置对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉支架置入术的预后预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Dec 1;70(7):1025-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21359.
5
CAPTURE 2 risk-adjusted stroke outcome benchmarks for carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection.使用远端栓塞保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术的 CAPTURE 2 风险调整后的卒中结果基准。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):576-83, 583.e1-583.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.064. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
6
Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.高危患者中颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1493-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040127.
7
Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.高危患者中颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术的长期结果
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 10;358(15):1572-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708028.
8
Thirty-day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high-surgical-risk registries.来自 2 个前瞻性、多中心、高手术风险登记处的 6320 例患者的颈动脉支架置入术 30 天结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun;2(3):159-66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
9
The CAPTURE registry: analysis of strokes resulting from carotid artery stenting in the post approval setting: timing, location, severity, and type.CAPTURE注册研究:批准后环境下颈动脉支架置入术所致卒中的分析:时间、部位、严重程度及类型
Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):551-6; discussion 556-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181567a39.
10
Carotid artery stenting in high surgical risk patients using the FiberNet embolic protection system: the EPIC trial results.使用 FiberNet 栓塞保护系统对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉支架置入术:EPIC 试验结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 May 1;75(6):817-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22386.

引用本文的文献

1
Appropriateness of care: Asymptomatic carotid stenosis including transcarotid artery revascularization.适宜性评估:无症状性颈动脉狭窄,包括颈动脉血运重建术。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;37(2):179-187. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.03.002. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Flow arrest during carotid artery stenting with a distal embolic protection device: A single-center experience and clinical implications.使用远端栓塞保护装置进行颈动脉支架置入术时的血流停滞:单中心经验及临床意义
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2024 Jun;26(2):163-173. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.10.001. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
第二代与第一代颈动脉支架的临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):4819. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164819.
4
The less invasive paradox, why carotid artery stenting is not suitable for the high-risk patient.微创悖论:为何颈动脉支架置入术不适用于高危患者。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1269. doi: 10.21037/atm-19-4085.
5
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 25;2(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub5.
6
Proximal Protected Carotid Artery Stenting and Neurologic Intolerance: Can We Predict before Stenting?近端保护型颈动脉支架置入术与神经功能不耐受:我们能否在支架置入前进行预测?
Korean Circ J. 2018 Mar;48(3):230-232. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0017.
7
Clinical results of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的临床结果
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2016 Oct;21(4):319-325. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2016.4.20160079.
8
Diagnostic vascular ultrasonography with the help of color Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.诊断血管超声检查(彩色多谱勒和超声造影)。
Ultrasonography. 2016 Oct;35(4):289-301. doi: 10.14366/usg.16027. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
9
Association of CYP2C19 Polymorphisms with the Clinical Efficacy of Clopidogrel Therapy in Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stenting in Asia.亚洲人群颈动脉支架置入术后氯吡格雷治疗的临床疗效与 CYP2C19 多态性的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2016 May 3;6:25478. doi: 10.1038/srep25478.
10
Percutaneous Aspiration Thrombectomy for Arterial Thromboembolism during Infrainguinal Endovascular Recanalization.经皮抽吸血栓切除术治疗股下血管腔内再通术中的动脉血栓栓塞
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 20;10(10):e0140494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140494. eCollection 2015.