药物警戒中的数据挖掘：幽灵船的教训。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Data mining in pharmacovigilance: lessons from phantom ships.

作者信息

Hauben Manfred, Reich Lester, Van Puijenbroek Eugène P, Gerrits Charles M, Patadia Vaishali K

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Nov;62(11):967-70. doi: 10.1007/s00228-006-0181-4. Epub 2006 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00228-006-0181-4

PMID:16896782

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Data mining in pharmacovigilance: lessons from phantom ships.药物警戒中的数据挖掘：幽灵船的教训。

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Nov;62(11):967-70. doi: 10.1007/s00228-006-0181-4. Epub 2006 Aug 3.

Data mining in pharmacovigilance: the need for a balanced perspective.药物警戒中的数据挖掘：需要一种平衡的视角。

Drug Saf. 2005;28(10):835-42. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528100-00001.

Mining association patterns of drug-interactions using post marketing FDA's spontaneous reporting data.利用美国食品药品监督管理局（FDA）上市后自发报告数据挖掘药物相互作用的关联模式。

J Biomed Inform. 2016 Apr;60:294-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 20.

Adverse drug reactions in neonates: could we be documenting more?新生儿的药物不良反应：我们是否能记录得更多？

Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;7(6):807-20. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2014.956090. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

Portable automatic text classification for adverse drug reaction detection via multi-corpus training.通过多语料库训练实现用于药物不良反应检测的便携式自动文本分类

J Biomed Inform. 2015 Feb;53:196-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 8.

Detection of dechallenge in spontaneous reporting systems: a comparison of Bayes methods.自发报告系统中撤药反应的检测：贝叶斯方法比较

Indian J Pharmacol. 2014 May-Jun;46(3):277-80. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.132157.

Data mining spontaneous adverse drug event reports for safety signals in Singapore - a comparison of three different disproportionality measures.挖掘新加坡自发药品不良事件报告中的安全信号——三种不同不相称性测量方法的比较

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016 May;15(5):583-90. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2016.1167184. Epub 2016 Apr 7.

Using real-world healthcare data for pharmacovigilance signal detection - the experience of the EU-ADR project.利用真实世界医疗保健数据进行药物警戒信号检测——欧盟药物不良反应（EU-ADR）项目的经验

Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;8(1):95-102. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2015.992878.

Causality assessment in pharmacovigilance: The French method and its successive updates.药物警戒中的因果关系评估：法国方法及其后续更新

Therapie. 2016 Apr;71(2):179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Feb 6.

Statistical and graphical approaches for disproportionality analysis of spontaneously-reported adverse events in pharmacovigilance.统计和图形方法在药物警戒中用于自发报告不良事件的不适当性分析。

Chin J Nat Med. 2013 May;11(3):314-20. doi: 10.1016/S1875-5364(13)60035-7.

引用本文的文献

Interplay of Spontaneous Reporting and Longitudinal Healthcare Databases for Signal Management: Position Statement from the Real-World Evidence and Big Data Special Interest Group of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance.自发报告与纵向医疗保健数据库在信号管理中的相互作用：国际药物警戒协会真实世界证据与大数据特别兴趣小组的立场声明

Drug Saf. 2025 Apr 13. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01548-3.

The use of older studies in meta-analyses of medical interventions: a survey.医学干预荟萃分析中旧研究的使用：一项调查

Open Med. 2009 May 26;3(2):e62-8.

Impact of safety alerts on measures of disproportionality in spontaneous reporting databases: the notoriety bias.安全警报对自发报告数据库中不成比例性衡量指标的影响：恶名偏见。

Drug Saf. 2007;30(10):891-8. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730100-00007.

Gold standards in pharmacovigilance: the use of definitive anecdotal reports of adverse drug reactions as pure gold and high-grade ore.药物警戒的金标准：将药物不良反应的确切轶事性报告用作纯金和高品位矿石。

Drug Saf. 2007;30(8):645-55. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730080-00001.

Illusions of objectivity and a recommendation for reporting data mining results.客观性的错觉及数据挖掘结果报告的建议

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 May;63(5):517-21. doi: 10.1007/s00228-007-0279-3. Epub 2007 Mar 16.

Potential use of data-mining algorithms for the detection of 'surprise' adverse drug reactions.数据挖掘算法在检测“意外”药物不良反应中的潜在应用。

Drug Saf. 2007;30(2):143-55. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730020-00004.

Evolution and translation of research findings: from bench to where?研究成果的演变与转化：从实验室到何处？

PLoS Clin Trials. 2006 Nov 17;1(7):e36. doi: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010036.

本文引用的文献

Data mining in pharmacovigilance: the need for a balanced perspective.药物警戒中的数据挖掘：需要一种平衡的视角。

Drug Saf. 2005;28(10):835-42. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528100-00001.

Signal detection in pharmacovigilance: empirical evaluation of data mining tools.药物警戒中的信号检测：数据挖掘工具的实证评估

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Sep;14(9):597-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.1128.

The role of data mining in pharmacovigilance.数据挖掘在药物警戒中的作用。

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2005 Sep;4(5):929-48. doi: 10.1517/14740338.4.5.929.

Communication of findings in pharmacovigilance: use of the term "signal" and the need for precision in its use.药物警戒中研究结果的传达：“信号”一词的使用及其精确使用的必要性。

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jul;61(5-6):479-80. doi: 10.1007/s00228-005-0951-4. Epub 2005 Jul 1.

Sulfonamide cross-reactivity: fact or fiction?磺胺类药物交叉反应：事实还是虚构？

Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Feb;39(2):290-301. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E350. Epub 2005 Jan 11.

Not all sulfa drugs are created equal.

Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Dec;38(12):2166-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E206. Epub 2004 Oct 19.

Expecting the unexpected--drug safety, pharmacovigilance, and the prepared mind.预料之外之事——药物安全、药物警戒与有备之心。

N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1385-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048187.

Malignant melanoma and levodopa in Parkinson's disease: causality or coincidence?恶性黑色素瘤与帕金森病中的左旋多巴：因果关系还是巧合？

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2003 Aug;9(6):321-7. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8020(03)00040-3.

[Pharmacovigilance: a case of phantom ships and Russian roulette].[药物警戒：幽灵船与俄罗斯轮盘赌的案例]

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 Jul 6;146(27):1258-61.

Use of screening algorithms and computer systems to efficiently signal higher-than-expected combinations of drugs and events in the US FDA's spontaneous reports database.在美国食品药品监督管理局（FDA）的自发报告数据库中，使用筛查算法和计算机系统来有效地标记高于预期的药物与事件组合。

Drug Saf. 2002;25(6):381-92. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200225060-00001.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验