Suppr超能文献

坦嫩鲍姆支架与金属支架在恶性远端胆管梗阻姑息治疗中的应用:通畅率及成本效益的比较研究

Tannenbaum and metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant distal bile duct obstruction: a comparative study of patency and cost effectiveness.

作者信息

Katsinelos P, Paikos D, Kountouras J, Chatzimavroudis G, Paroutoglou G, Moschos I, Gatopoulou A, Beltsis A, Zavos C, Papaziogas B

机构信息

Department of Endoscopy and Motility Unit, Central Hospital, 41 Ethnikis Aminis St., Thessaloniki, 546 35, Greece.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2006 Oct;20(10):1587-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0778-1. Epub 2006 Aug 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stent clogging is the major limitation of palliative treatment for malignant biliary obstruction. Metal stents have much better patency than plastic stents, but are more expensive. Preliminary data suggest that the recently designed plastic (Tannenbaum) stent has better duration of patency than the polyethylene stent. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and cost effectiveness between the Tannenbaum stent without side holes and the uncovered metal stent for patients with malignant distal common bile duct obstruction.

METHODS

In this study, 47 patients (median age, 73 years, range, 56-86 years) with inoperable malignant distal common bile duct strictures were prospectively randomized to receive either a Tannenbaum stent (n = 24) or an uncovered self-expandable metal stent (n = 23). The patients were clinically evaluated, and biochemical tests were analyzed if necessary until their death or surgery for gastric outlet obstruction. Cumulative first stent patency and patient survival were compared between the two groups. Cost-effectiveness analysis also was performed for the two study groups.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, and diagnosis. The median first stent patency was longer in the metal group than in the Tannenbaum stent group (255 vs 123.5 days; p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in survival between the two groups. The total cost associated with the Tannenbaum stents was lower than for the metal stents (17,700 vs 30,100 euros; p = 0.001), especially for patients with liver metastases (3,000 vs 6,900 euros; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Metal stent placement is an effective treatment for inoperable malignant distal common bile duct obstruction, but Tannenbaum stent placement is a cost-saving strategy, as compared with metal stent placement, especially for patients with liver metastases and expected short survival time.

摘要

背景

支架堵塞是恶性胆管梗阻姑息治疗的主要限制因素。金属支架的通畅性比塑料支架好得多,但价格更昂贵。初步数据表明,最近设计的塑料(坦嫩鲍姆)支架比聚乙烯支架具有更好的通畅持续时间。本研究旨在比较无侧孔坦嫩鲍姆支架与裸金属支架治疗恶性远端胆总管梗阻患者的疗效和成本效益。

方法

在本研究中,47例无法手术的恶性远端胆总管狭窄患者(中位年龄73岁,范围56 - 86岁)被前瞻性随机分为接受坦嫩鲍姆支架组(n = 24)或裸自膨式金属支架组(n = 23)。对患者进行临床评估,并在必要时分析生化检查结果,直至其死亡或因胃出口梗阻接受手术。比较两组的累积首次支架通畅率和患者生存率。还对两个研究组进行了成本效益分析。

结果

两组在年龄、性别和诊断方面具有可比性。金属支架组的中位首次支架通畅时间比坦嫩鲍姆支架组长(255天对123.5天;p = 0.002)。两组的生存率无显著差异。坦嫩鲍姆支架的总费用低于金属支架(17,700欧元对30,100欧元;p = 0.001),尤其是对于有肝转移的患者(3,000欧元对6,900欧元;p < 0.001)。

结论

金属支架置入是治疗无法手术的恶性远端胆总管梗阻的有效方法,但与金属支架置入相比,坦嫩鲍姆支架置入是一种节省成本的策略,尤其是对于有肝转移且预期生存时间短的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验