Tsao Doris Y, Freiwald Winrich A
Brain Research Institute, Center for Advanced Imaging, University of Bremen D28334, Bremen, Germany.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep;10(9):391-3. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
The past few years have seen a marked increase in our understanding of how faces are represented in the brain, with the discovery of new anatomical structures and new algorithms for representing faces. Still, the basic computational mechanism used by the primate visual system to identify faces remains a topic of intense debate. Are faces represented by matching to a set of stored exemplars, or by measuring the distance from a standard prototype along a set of different axes? A recent article by Rhodes and Jeffery provides compelling psychophysical evidence in favor of the latter 'axis' model.
在过去几年里,随着新的解剖结构以及面部表征新算法的发现,我们对面部在大脑中的表征方式的理解有了显著提升。然而,灵长类视觉系统用于识别面部的基本计算机制仍是一个激烈争论的话题。面部是通过与一组存储的范例进行匹配来表征,还是通过沿着一组不同轴测量与标准原型的距离来表征呢?罗德兹和杰弗里最近发表的一篇文章提供了令人信服的心理物理学证据,支持后一种“轴”模型。