Rassweiler J, Teber D, de la Rosette J, Laguna P, Pansodoro V, Frede T
Urologische Klinik, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Heidelberg, Am Gesundbrunnen 20, 74074, Heilbronn.
Urologe A. 2006 Sep;45(9):1135-6, 1138-44. doi: 10.1007/s00120-006-1151-2.
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has become an equivalent alternative to the open retropubic approach, offering the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. It is being applied increasingly in Germany and the rest of Europe. Whether the surgical robot da Vinci will be used for this procedure to the same extent as in the United States is unpredictable because of high investment and maintenance costs. Similarly, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has proven to be a viable option compared to open transabdominal or transvaginal surgery, showing a significant reduction in postoperative morbidity. The value of radical cystectomy is controversial despite proven feasability. On one hand, the technical difficulties of purely laparoscopic urinary diversion result in very long operating times, and in the case of the laparoscopically assisted creation of a neobladder, the advantage of this approach has to be questioned. On the other hand, a maximum rate of 30% of local recurrences and distant metastases indicates at least poor patient selection. In conclusion, this procedure should be limited to a few experienced centers.
腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术已成为耻骨后开放手术的等效替代方法,具有微创手术的优势。它在德国和欧洲其他地区的应用越来越广泛。由于投资和维护成本高昂,手术机器人达芬奇是否会在美国那样广泛应用于该手术尚不可知。同样,与开放性经腹或经阴道手术相比,腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术已被证明是一种可行的选择,术后发病率显著降低。尽管已证明根治性膀胱切除术可行,但其价值仍存在争议。一方面,单纯腹腔镜尿路改道的技术难度导致手术时间极长,而且在腹腔镜辅助创建新膀胱的情况下,这种方法的优势值得质疑。另一方面,高达30%的局部复发和远处转移率表明患者选择至少不佳。总之,该手术应限于少数有经验的中心。