Appleby Peter A, Elliott Terry
Institute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany.
Neural Comput. 2006 Oct;18(10):2414-64. doi: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.10.2414.
In earlier work we presented a stochastic model of spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) in which STDP emerges only at the level of temporal or spatial synaptic ensembles. We derived the two-spike interaction function from this model and showed that it exhibits an STDP-like form. Here, we extend this work by examining the general n-spike interaction functions that may be derived from the model. A comparison between the two-spike interaction function and the higher-order interaction functions reveals profound differences. In particular, we show that the two-spike interaction function cannot support stable, competitive synaptic plasticity, such as that seen during neuronal development, without including modifications designed specifically to stabilize its behavior. In contrast, we show that all the higher-order interaction functions exhibit a fixed-point structure consistent with the presence of competitive synaptic dynamics. This difference originates in the unification of our proposed "switch" mechanism for synaptic plasticity, coupling synaptic depression and synaptic potentiation processes together. While three or more spikes are required to probe this coupling, two spikes can never do so. We conclude that this coupling is critical to the presence of competitive dynamics and that multispike interactions are therefore vital to understanding synaptic competition.
在早期工作中,我们提出了一种依赖于脉冲时间的可塑性(STDP)的随机模型,其中STDP仅在时间或空间突触集合水平上出现。我们从该模型中推导了双脉冲相互作用函数,并表明它呈现出类似STDP的形式。在这里,我们通过研究可能从该模型中推导出来的一般n脉冲相互作用函数来扩展这项工作。双脉冲相互作用函数与高阶相互作用函数之间的比较揭示了深刻的差异。特别是,我们表明,双脉冲相互作用函数如果不包括专门为稳定其行为而设计的修改,就无法支持稳定的、竞争性的突触可塑性,比如在神经元发育过程中所看到的那样。相比之下,我们表明所有高阶相互作用函数都表现出与竞争性突触动力学的存在相一致的不动点结构。这种差异源于我们提出的用于突触可塑性的“开关”机制的统一,该机制将突触抑制和突触增强过程耦合在一起。虽然探测这种耦合需要三个或更多脉冲,但两个脉冲永远无法做到。我们得出结论,这种耦合对于竞争性动力学的存在至关重要,因此多脉冲相互作用对于理解突触竞争至关重要。