• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗波动稳定性:突触可塑性随机模型中尺度变换、分岔和自发对称性破缺的二维研究

Stability against fluctuations: a two-dimensional study of scaling, bifurcations and spontaneous symmetry breaking in stochastic models of synaptic plasticity.

作者信息

Elliott Terry

机构信息

Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

出版信息

Biol Cybern. 2024 Apr;118(1-2):39-81. doi: 10.1007/s00422-024-00985-0. Epub 2024 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00422-024-00985-0
PMID:38583095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11602831/
Abstract

Stochastic models of synaptic plasticity must confront the corrosive influence of fluctuations in synaptic strength on patterns of synaptic connectivity. To solve this problem, we have proposed that synapses act as filters, integrating plasticity induction signals and expressing changes in synaptic strength only upon reaching filter threshold. Our earlier analytical study calculated the lifetimes of quasi-stable patterns of synaptic connectivity with synaptic filtering. We showed that the plasticity step size in a stochastic model of spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) acts as a temperature-like parameter, exhibiting a critical value below which neuronal structure formation occurs. The filter threshold scales this temperature-like parameter downwards, cooling the dynamics and enhancing stability. A key step in this calculation was a resetting approximation, essentially reducing the dynamics to one-dimensional processes. Here, we revisit our earlier study to examine this resetting approximation, with the aim of understanding in detail why it works so well by comparing it, and a simpler approximation, to the system's full dynamics consisting of various embedded two-dimensional processes without resetting. Comparing the full system to the simpler approximation, to our original resetting approximation, and to a one-afferent system, we show that their equilibrium distributions of synaptic strengths and critical plasticity step sizes are all qualitatively similar, and increasingly quantitatively similar as the filter threshold increases. This increasing similarity is due to the decorrelation in changes in synaptic strength between different afferents caused by our STDP model, and the amplification of this decorrelation with larger synaptic filters.

摘要

突触可塑性的随机模型必须应对突触强度波动对突触连接模式的侵蚀性影响。为了解决这个问题,我们提出突触起到滤波器的作用,整合可塑性诱导信号,并且仅在达到滤波器阈值时才表达突触强度的变化。我们早期的分析研究计算了具有突触滤波的突触连接准稳定模式的寿命。我们表明,在依赖于尖峰时间的可塑性(STDP)的随机模型中,可塑性步长起着类似温度的参数的作用,呈现出一个临界值,低于该临界值时神经元结构形成就会发生。滤波器阈值向下缩放这个类似温度的参数,冷却动力学并增强稳定性。此计算中的一个关键步骤是重置近似,本质上是将动力学简化为一维过程。在这里,我们重新审视我们早期的研究以检验这个重置近似,目的是通过将其与一个更简单的近似以及由各种无重置的嵌入式二维过程组成的系统的完整动力学进行比较,详细理解它为何能如此有效。将完整系统与更简单的近似、我们原来的重置近似以及单传入系统进行比较,我们表明它们的突触强度平衡分布和临界可塑性步长在定性上都相似,并且随着滤波器阈值的增加在定量上越来越相似。这种越来越高的相似性是由于我们的STDP模型导致不同传入之间突触强度变化的去相关,以及更大的突触滤波器对这种去相关的放大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/45e07f610f08/422_2024_985_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/1df495899ead/422_2024_985_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/1d1465532050/422_2024_985_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/4ffdd325bc33/422_2024_985_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/db6e155338ee/422_2024_985_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/23034c9ba052/422_2024_985_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/2517df466eae/422_2024_985_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/793ca6edbfcd/422_2024_985_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/77004ce6e819/422_2024_985_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/6495ac8c38f4/422_2024_985_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/64f616f6b9d7/422_2024_985_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/481a0b9708bf/422_2024_985_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/679941ba035d/422_2024_985_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/483b11b50952/422_2024_985_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/e97a4f61e2d6/422_2024_985_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/c50d720b3620/422_2024_985_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/5c0287917625/422_2024_985_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/cdde2ed1d1a8/422_2024_985_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/45e07f610f08/422_2024_985_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/1df495899ead/422_2024_985_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/1d1465532050/422_2024_985_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/4ffdd325bc33/422_2024_985_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/db6e155338ee/422_2024_985_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/23034c9ba052/422_2024_985_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/2517df466eae/422_2024_985_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/793ca6edbfcd/422_2024_985_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/77004ce6e819/422_2024_985_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/6495ac8c38f4/422_2024_985_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/64f616f6b9d7/422_2024_985_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/481a0b9708bf/422_2024_985_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/679941ba035d/422_2024_985_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/483b11b50952/422_2024_985_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/e97a4f61e2d6/422_2024_985_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/c50d720b3620/422_2024_985_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/5c0287917625/422_2024_985_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/cdde2ed1d1a8/422_2024_985_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/11602831/45e07f610f08/422_2024_985_Fig18_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Stability against fluctuations: a two-dimensional study of scaling, bifurcations and spontaneous symmetry breaking in stochastic models of synaptic plasticity.抗波动稳定性:突触可塑性随机模型中尺度变换、分岔和自发对称性破缺的二维研究
Biol Cybern. 2024 Apr;118(1-2):39-81. doi: 10.1007/s00422-024-00985-0. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
2
Stability against fluctuations: scaling, bifurcations, and spontaneous symmetry breaking in stochastic models of synaptic plasticity.稳定性对抗波动:突触可塑性随机模型中的标度、分岔和自发对称性破缺。
Neural Comput. 2011 Mar;23(3):674-734. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00088. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
3
The mean time to express synaptic plasticity in integrate-and-express, stochastic models of synaptic plasticity induction.整合与表达的随机突触可塑性诱导模型中表达突触可塑性的平均时间。
Neural Comput. 2011 Jan;23(1):124-59. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00061. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
4
Taming fluctuations in a stochastic model of spike-timing-dependent plasticity.驯服基于峰电位时间依赖性可塑性的随机模型中的波动。
Neural Comput. 2009 Dec;21(12):3363-407. doi: 10.1162/neco.2009.12-08-916.
5
Stable competitive dynamics emerge from multispike interactions in a stochastic model of spike-timing-dependent plasticity.在一个基于脉冲时间依赖可塑性的随机模型中,稳定的竞争动力学源自多脉冲相互作用。
Neural Comput. 2006 Oct;18(10):2414-64. doi: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.10.2414.
6
A non-Markovian random walk underlies a stochastic model of spike-timing-dependent plasticity.非马尔可夫随机游走是基于尖峰时间依赖可塑性的随机模型。
Neural Comput. 2010 May;22(5):1180-230. doi: 10.1162/neco.2009.06-09-1038.
7
Stochastic perturbation methods for spike-timing-dependent plasticity.随机微扰方法在尖峰时间依赖可塑性中的应用。
Neural Comput. 2012 May;24(5):1109-46. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00267. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
8
Temporal dynamics of rate-based synaptic plasticity rules in a stochastic model of spike-timing-dependent plasticity.基于速率的突触可塑性规则在依赖于脉冲时间的可塑性随机模型中的时间动态。
Neural Comput. 2008 Sep;20(9):2253-307. doi: 10.1162/neco.2008.06-07-555.
9
Reducing the variability of neural responses: a computational theory of spike-timing-dependent plasticity.减少神经反应的变异性:一种尖峰时间依赖性可塑性的计算理论。
Neural Comput. 2007 Feb;19(2):371-403. doi: 10.1162/neco.2007.19.2.371.
10
Stability and Competition in Multi-spike Models of Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity.基于发放时间依赖可塑性的多峰模型中的稳定性与竞争性
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Mar 3;12(3):e1004750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004750. eCollection 2016 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Variations on the Theme of Synaptic Filtering: A Comparison of Integrate-and-Express Models of Synaptic Plasticity for Memory Lifetimes.突触过滤主题的变体:记忆寿命中突触可塑性整合与表达模型的比较
Neural Comput. 2016 Nov;28(11):2393-2460. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00889. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
2
Nanoconnectomic upper bound on the variability of synaptic plasticity.纳米连接组学对突触可塑性变异性的上限
Elife. 2015 Nov 30;4:e10778. doi: 10.7554/eLife.10778.
3
The rise and fall of memory in a model of synaptic integration.记忆在突触整合模型中的兴衰。
Neural Comput. 2012 Oct;24(10):2604-54. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00335. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
4
Stability against fluctuations: scaling, bifurcations, and spontaneous symmetry breaking in stochastic models of synaptic plasticity.稳定性对抗波动:突触可塑性随机模型中的标度、分岔和自发对称性破缺。
Neural Comput. 2011 Mar;23(3):674-734. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00088. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
5
The mean time to express synaptic plasticity in integrate-and-express, stochastic models of synaptic plasticity induction.整合与表达的随机突触可塑性诱导模型中表达突触可塑性的平均时间。
Neural Comput. 2011 Jan;23(1):124-59. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00061. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
6
A non-Markovian random walk underlies a stochastic model of spike-timing-dependent plasticity.非马尔可夫随机游走是基于尖峰时间依赖可塑性的随机模型。
Neural Comput. 2010 May;22(5):1180-230. doi: 10.1162/neco.2009.06-09-1038.
7
Taming fluctuations in a stochastic model of spike-timing-dependent plasticity.驯服基于峰电位时间依赖性可塑性的随机模型中的波动。
Neural Comput. 2009 Dec;21(12):3363-407. doi: 10.1162/neco.2009.12-08-916.
8
Temporal dynamics of rate-based synaptic plasticity rules in a stochastic model of spike-timing-dependent plasticity.基于速率的突触可塑性规则在依赖于脉冲时间的可塑性随机模型中的时间动态。
Neural Comput. 2008 Sep;20(9):2253-307. doi: 10.1162/neco.2008.06-07-555.
9
Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule.尖峰时间依赖性可塑性:一种赫布学习规则。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:25-46. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125639.
10
Locally dynamic synaptic learning rules in pyramidal neuron dendrites.锥体神经元树突中的局部动态突触学习规则。
Nature. 2007 Dec 20;450(7173):1195-200. doi: 10.1038/nature06416.