• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌恶性肿瘤细胞学和组织学分级系统概况的比较与评估研究——一项重要的预后因素。

A comparative and evaluative study of cytological and histological grading system profile in malignant neoplasm of breast--an important prognostic factor.

作者信息

Meena Sudha Pankaj, Hemrajani Deepika K, Joshi Narayani

机构信息

Department of Pathology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur.

出版信息

Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2006 Apr;49(2):199-202.

PMID:16933714
Abstract

Breast carcinoma is one of the leading causes of malignancy in females. Diagnosis of breast carcinoma is often made by fine needle aspiration biopsy. Nuclear grading is the most important prognostic factor. It is important to grade the breast carcinoma which will provide valuable information to the treating oncologist to plan the management. The purpose of the study is to compare the cytological grading with histological grading and to assess the prognosis according to the grade. 100 cases of breast carcinoma were graded cytologically by Robinson Grading system and 71 cases were graded histologically by modified Bloom-Richardson system and results of both were compared and statistical correlation was done. In the present study sensitivity and specificity of cytological grading system were 90.77% and 84.42% respectively.

摘要

乳腺癌是女性恶性肿瘤的主要原因之一。乳腺癌的诊断通常通过细针穿刺活检进行。核分级是最重要的预后因素。对乳腺癌进行分级很重要,这将为治疗肿瘤学家制定治疗方案提供有价值的信息。本研究的目的是比较细胞学分级与组织学分级,并根据分级评估预后。对100例乳腺癌病例采用罗宾逊分级系统进行细胞学分级,对71例病例采用改良的布鲁姆-理查森系统进行组织学分级,比较两者结果并进行统计学相关性分析。在本研究中,细胞学分级系统的敏感性和特异性分别为90.77%和84.42%。

相似文献

1
A comparative and evaluative study of cytological and histological grading system profile in malignant neoplasm of breast--an important prognostic factor.乳腺癌恶性肿瘤细胞学和组织学分级系统概况的比较与评估研究——一项重要的预后因素。
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2006 Apr;49(2):199-202.
2
Cytological grading of breast neoplasia and its correlation with histological grading.乳腺肿瘤的细胞学分级及其与组织学分级的相关性。
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2006 Apr;49(2):208-13.
3
Cytohistological correlation of grading in breast carcinoma.乳腺癌分级的细胞组织学相关性
Diagn Cytopathol. 2011 Apr;39(4):251-7. doi: 10.1002/dc.21374.
4
Introduction of the cytological grading, the nuclear area, the DNA index and the DNA histogram type in the setting up of a score for ductal breast carcinoma.在建立乳腺导管癌评分体系中引入细胞学分级、核面积、DNA指数和DNA直方图类型。
Anticancer Res. 1994 Nov-Dec;14(6B):2845-51.
5
Cytopathological grading, as a predictor of histopathological grade, in ductal carcinoma (NOS) of breast, on air-dried Diff-Quik smears.在空气干燥的Diff-Quik涂片上,细胞病理学分级作为乳腺导管癌(非特殊类型)组织病理学分级的预测指标。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2003 Oct;29(4):185-93. doi: 10.1002/dc.10285.
6
Cytological grading of duct cell carcinoma, NOS of breast and its correlation with histological grading.乳腺导管细胞癌(非特殊类型)的细胞学分级及其与组织学分级的相关性
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2006 Aug;32(2):49-54.
7
Correlation of histologic grade of breast carcinoma with cytologic features on fine-needle aspiration of the breast.乳腺癌组织学分级与乳腺细针穿刺细胞学特征的相关性
Mod Pathol. 1993 Sep;6(5):539-43.
8
[Usefulness of cytoprognostic classification combined with histoprognostic classification in breast cancer].
Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy). 1993 Sep;77(238):33-6.
9
Correlation between type and grade of ductal carcinoma in situ and concomitant invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.乳腺导管原位癌的类型和分级与伴发浸润性导管癌之间的相关性。
Pol J Pathol. 2000;51(3):137-43.
10
Cytohistomorphological grading of breast carcinoma with special reference to apoptotic rates and lymph node metastasis.
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2007 Jul;50(3):613-8.

引用本文的文献

1
FNAC of Breast Lesions with Special Reference to IAC Standardized Reporting and Comparative Study of Cytohistological Grading of Breast Carcinoma.乳腺病变的细针穿刺抽吸活检,特别参考IAC标准化报告及乳腺癌细胞组织学分级的比较研究
J Cytol. 2020 Jan-Mar;37(1):34-39. doi: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_132_18. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
2
To Evaluate the Applicability of Parameters of Cytological Grading Systems on Aspirates of Breast Carcinoma.评估细胞学分级系统参数在乳腺癌穿刺物中的适用性。
J Cytol. 2018 Jan-Mar;35(1):15-21. doi: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_167_16.
3
Comparative evaluation of six parametric Robinson and three parametric Howell's modification of Scarf-BloomRichardson grading method on breast aspirates with histopathology: A prospective study.
六种参数化罗宾逊法和三种参数化豪厄尔对斯卡夫-布卢姆-理查森乳腺抽吸物分级方法的修改与组织病理学的比较评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Cytojournal. 2017 Dec 27;14:31. doi: 10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_31_17. eCollection 2017.
4
Comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma.乳腺癌中各种细胞形态学分级系统的比较评估
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2016 Apr-Jun;37(2):79-84. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.180141.
5
Role of triple test score in the evaluation of palpable breast lump.三联检测评分在可触及乳腺肿块评估中的作用
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2015 Apr-Jun;36(2):123-7. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.158846.
6
A comparative and evaluative study of two cytological grading systems in breast carcinoma with histological grading: an important prognostic factor.一项关于乳腺癌两种细胞学分级系统与组织学分级的比较及评估研究:一个重要的预后因素。
Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2014;2014:767215. doi: 10.1155/2014/767215. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
7
Cytological study of palpable breast lumps presenting in an Indian rural setup.印度农村地区可触及乳腺肿块的细胞学研究。
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2014 Apr;35(2):159-64. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.138993.
8
Comparison of 3-tier cytological grading systems for breast carcinoma.乳腺癌三级细胞学分级系统的比较
ISRN Oncol. 2014 Mar 12;2014:252103. doi: 10.1155/2014/252103. eCollection 2014.
9
The cytological grading of malignant neoplasms of the breast and its correlation with the histological grading.乳腺恶性肿瘤的细胞学分级及其与组织学分级的相关性。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Jun;7(6):1035-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5906.3093. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
10
Comparative evaluation of six cytological grading systems in breast carcinoma.乳腺癌六种细胞学分级系统的比较评估
J Cytol. 2013 Apr;30(2):87-93. doi: 10.4103/0970-9371.112647.