Yücel Ali Cağin, Güler Eda, Güler Ahmet Umut, Ertaş Ertan
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Dentistry, Samsun, Turkey.
J Endod. 2006 Sep;32(9):890-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.04.002. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
The aim of this study was to compare bacterial penetration after obturation with lateral compaction technique using four different root canal sealers. This study was performed on 100 teeth including negative control (n = 10), positive control (n = 10), and experimental groups (n = 80). 80 teeth were randomly divided into five groups of 20 teeth each and obturated with AH 26 (A), AH Plus (AP), Sealapex (S), Ketac-Endo (K) root canal sealers. Evaluation was carried out for 60 days. After 30 days of comparing the bacterial penetration values, total penetration was observed in 85% of the Group AP, and group K, 80% of the group S, and 75% of the group A. According to the results of chi(2) test, there was no statistically significant difference observed between any groups (p > 0.05). After 60 days of comparing the bacterial penetration values, total penetration was observed in 100% of the group AP, group K, and group S and 95% of the group A. It may be concluded that under the conditions of this study, there was no difference in the bacterial penetration of the four root canal sealers tested at 30 and 60 days.
本研究的目的是比较使用四种不同根管封闭剂采用侧向加压技术进行根管充填后的细菌渗透情况。本研究对100颗牙齿进行,包括阴性对照组(n = 10)、阳性对照组(n = 10)和实验组(n = 80)。80颗牙齿随机分为五组,每组20颗,分别用AH 26(A组)、AH Plus(AP组)、Sealapex(S组)、Ketac-Endo(K组)根管封闭剂进行根管充填。评估持续60天。在比较细菌渗透值30天后,AP组、K组有85%观察到完全渗透,S组有80%,A组有75%。根据卡方检验结果,各实验组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异(p > 0.05)。在比较细菌渗透值60天后,AP组、K组和S组有100%观察到完全渗透,A组有95%。可以得出结论,在本研究条件下,所测试的四种根管封闭剂在30天和60天时的细菌渗透情况没有差异。