Suppr超能文献

光活化消毒对三种不同根管封闭剂粘结强度的影响。

Effect of photo-activated disinfection on bond strength of three different root canal sealers.

作者信息

Ok Evren, Ertas Huseyin, Saygili Gokhan, Gok Tuba

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sifa University, Izmir, Turkiye.

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkiye.

出版信息

Eur J Dent. 2014 Jan;8(1):85-89. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126252.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bond strength of Photo-Activated Disinfection (PAD) system to dentin with different root canal sealers by using a push-out test design.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30 extracted mandibular premolar teeth with single and straight roots were used. The crowns were removed and the root canals were prepared by using ProTaper rotary files. The smear layer was removed and the roots were randomly divided into two groups (n = 15) according to the use of PAD system as the final disinfecting agent. Each group was then divided into 6 (n = 5) subgroups and obturated with gutta-percha and 3 different root canal sealers. The groups were Group 1: Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) + ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-AH Plus sealer; Group 2: NaOCl + EDTA + PAD-AH Plus; Group 3: NaOCl + EDTA-Sealapex; Group 4: NaOCl + EDTA + PAD-Sealapex; Group 5: NaOCl + EDTA-mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-Fiallapex; and Group 6: NaOCl + EDTA + PAD-MTA-Fillapex. 1-mm thickness horizontal sections (n: 5 × 4 = 20) were sliced for the push-out bond strength measurement.

RESULTS

Group 3 and 4 showed significantly lower bond strengths compared with all the other groups (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found among Groups 1, 2 and 5, but there was statistically significant difference between Group 5 and 6 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This in vitro study indicated that the PAD system adversely affected the bond strength of the MTA Fillapex root canal sealer.

摘要

引言

本体外研究的目的是通过推出试验设计,评估光活化消毒(PAD)系统与不同根管封闭剂对牙本质的粘结强度。

材料与方法

共使用30颗单根直根的拔除下颌前磨牙。去除牙冠,使用ProTaper旋转锉预备根管。去除玷污层,根据是否使用PAD系统作为最终消毒剂将牙根随机分为两组(n = 15)。然后每组再分为6个(n = 5)亚组,用牙胶和3种不同的根管封闭剂进行充填。分组如下:第1组:次氯酸钠(NaOCl)+乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)-AH Plus封闭剂;第2组:NaOCl + EDTA + PAD-AH Plus;第3组:NaOCl + EDTA-Sealapex;第4组:NaOCl + EDTA + PAD-Sealapex;第5组:NaOCl + EDTA-三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)-Fiallapex;第6组:NaOCl + EDTA + PAD-MTA-Fillapex。制备1毫米厚的水平切片(n:5×4 = 20)用于推出粘结强度测量。

结果

与所有其他组相比,第3组和第4组的粘结强度显著降低(P < 0.05)。第1、2和5组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异,但第5组和第6组之间存在统计学上的显著差异(P < 0.05)。

结论

本体外研究表明,PAD系统对MTA Fillapex根管封闭剂的粘结强度有不利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceed/4054038/d1029311cf41/EJD-8-85-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验