van den Akker Olga B A
Life & Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Jan-Feb;13(1):53-62. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml039. Epub 2006 Aug 26.
This review addresses the psychosocial research carried out on surrogacy triads (surrogate mothers, commissioning mothers and offspring) and shows that research has focused on a number of specific issues: attachment and disclosure to surrogate offspring; experiences, characteristics and motivations of surrogate mothers; and changes in profiles of the commissioning/intended mothers. Virtually all studies have used highly selected samples making generalizations difficult. There have been a notable lack of theory, no interventions and only a handful of longitudinal studies or studies comparing different populations. Few studies have specifically questioned the meaning of and need for a family or the influence and impact that professionals, treatment availability and financial factors have on the choices made for surrogate and intended mothers. Societal attitudes have changed somewhat; however, according to public opinion, women giving up babies still fall outside the acceptable remit. Surrogate and intended mothers appear to reconcile their unusual choice through a process of cognitive restructuring, and the success or failure of this cognitive appraisal affects people's willingness to be open and honest about their choices. Normal population surveys, on the contrary, are less accepting of third party reproduction; they have no personal need to reconsider and hence maintain their original normative cognitively consonant state.
本综述探讨了针对代孕三方(代孕母亲、委托母亲和后代)开展的社会心理研究,并表明研究集中在一些特定问题上:对代孕后代的依恋和信息披露;代孕母亲的经历、特征和动机;以及委托/意向母亲形象的变化。几乎所有研究都采用了经过高度筛选的样本,这使得进行概括变得困难。明显缺乏理论支持,没有干预措施,只有少数纵向研究或比较不同人群的研究。很少有研究专门探讨家庭的意义和需求,或者专业人员、治疗可及性和经济因素对代孕母亲和意向母亲所做选择的影响。社会态度有所变化;然而,根据民意调查,放弃孩子的女性仍然不在可接受范围内。代孕母亲和意向母亲似乎通过认知重构过程来调和她们不同寻常的选择,这种认知评估的成功或失败会影响人们对自己选择坦诚相告的意愿。相反,普通人群调查对第三方生殖的接受度较低;他们没有个人需求去重新考虑,因此保持其原有的认知协调规范状态。