Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC, Canada.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Feb 8;19:11. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-11.
Recent literature states that many necessary skills of CPR and first aid are forgotten shortly after certification. The purpose of this study was to determine the skill and knowledge decay in first aid in those who are paid to respond to emergency situations within a workplace.
Using a choking victim scenario, the sequence and accuracy of events were observed and recorded in 257 participants paid to act as first responders in large industrial or service industry settings. A multiple choice exam was also written to determine knowledge retention.
First aid knowledge was higher in those who were trained at a higher level, and did not significantly decline over time. Those who had renewed their certificate one or more times performed better than those who had learned the information only once. During the choking scenario many skills were performed poorly, regardless of days since last training, such as hand placement and abdominal thrusts. Compressions following the victim becoming unconscious also showed classic signs of skill deterioration after 30 days.
As many skills deteriorate rapidly over the course of the first 90 days, changing frequency of certification is not necessarily the most obvious choice to increase retention of skill and knowledge. Alternatively, methods of regularly "refreshing" a skill should be explored that could be delivered at a high frequency - such as every 90 days.
最近的文献表明,许多心肺复苏术(CPR)和急救的必要技能在认证后不久就会被遗忘。本研究的目的是确定在需要对工作场所的紧急情况做出响应的人员中,急救技能和知识的衰减情况。
在 257 名有偿参与大型工业或服务业环境中急救工作的参与者中,使用窒息受害者场景观察和记录事件的顺序和准确性。还编写了多项选择题考试,以确定知识保留情况。
受过更高水平培训的人急救知识更高,并且随着时间的推移没有明显下降。那些已经更新证书一次或多次的人比只学习过一次信息的人表现更好。在窒息场景中,许多技能表现不佳,无论距离上次培训的天数如何,例如手部放置和腹部推挤。在受害者失去意识后进行的按压也显示出在 30 天后技能明显恶化的迹象。
由于许多技能在最初的 90 天内迅速恶化,因此增加技能和知识保留的频率并不是提高技能和知识保留的最明显选择。相反,应该探索定期“更新”技能的方法,这种方法可以高频次地进行,例如每 90 天一次。