Suppr超能文献

革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌刺激后先天免疫反应的差异。

Differences in innate immune responses upon stimulation with gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.

作者信息

Tietze Konrad, Dalpke Alexander, Morath Sigfried, Mutters Reinier, Heeg Klaus, Nonnenmacher Claudia

机构信息

Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Periodontal Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):447-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00890.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Host recognition pathways for gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria comprise pattern recognition receptors among which Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play a pivotal role. TLRs share common signaling pathways yet exhibit specificity as well. Periodontal disease is initiated and maintained in the first line by gram-negative but also gram-positive bacterial infection of the gingival sulcus. To date only limited information is available on whether gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria induce different host responses (strength or quality).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To elucidate these differential effects we focused on proinflammatory cytokine releases by assessing ex vivo stimulation of whole blood with heat-killed gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria and thereof derived microbial products associated with distinct TLRs. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-8 release were measured in the supernatants by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In addition, innate immune responses of peritoneal macrophages from mice lacking TLR2 and TLR4 were tested.

RESULTS

We observed that gram-negative and gram-positive species induced distinct patterns of cytokine production. Gram-negative species produced higher amounts of tumor necrosis factor-alpha while gram-positive species released higher amounts of the chemokine interleukin-8. Data from TLR knockout mice and TLR-transfected HEK cells revealed a somehow specific role of TLR4 and TLR2 for the recognition of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, respectively, an observation that goes along with the dominant recognition of the respective pathogen associated molecular patterns lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial species induce different patterns of immunoregulatory activity, which might be the result of activation of different TLRs.

摘要

背景与目的

革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌的宿主识别途径包括模式识别受体,其中Toll样受体(TLR)起关键作用。TLR共享共同的信号通路,但也具有特异性。牙周病首先由牙龈沟的革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌感染引发并持续存在。迄今为止,关于革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌是否诱导不同的宿主反应(强度或性质)的信息有限。

材料与方法

为阐明这些差异效应,我们通过评估热灭活的革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌对全血的体外刺激以及与之相关的、与不同TLR相关的微生物产物,来关注促炎细胞因子的释放。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法测量上清液中肿瘤坏死因子-α和白细胞介素-8的释放。此外,还测试了缺乏TLR2和TLR4的小鼠腹膜巨噬细胞的天然免疫反应。

结果

我们观察到革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌诱导出不同的细胞因子产生模式。革兰氏阴性菌产生更高量的肿瘤坏死因子-α,而革兰氏阳性菌释放更高量的趋化因子白细胞介素-8。来自TLR基因敲除小鼠和TLR转染的HEK细胞的数据分别揭示了TLR4和TLR2在识别革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌方面的某种特定作用,这一观察结果与对各自病原体相关分子模式脂多糖和脂磷壁酸的主要识别一致。

结论

结果表明,革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌诱导不同模式的免疫调节活性,这可能是不同TLR激活的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验