Suppr超能文献

确证试验提高了衣原体酶试验对宫颈沙眼衣原体感染检测的特异性。

Confirmatory assay increases specificity of the chlamydiazyme test for Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix.

作者信息

Moncada J, Schachter J, Bolan G, Engelman J, Howard L, Mushahwar I, Ridgway G, Mumtaz G, Stamm W, Clark A

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Aug;28(8):1770-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.8.1770-1773.1990.

Abstract

Enzyme immunoassays for the detection of chlamydial antigens are commonly used to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infection. As is true for all nonculture methods, the specificities of these tests are a concern. A confirmatory blocking assay (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.) was evaluated at four sexually transmitted disease test sites. This assay is designed to confirm true-positive Chlamydiazyme (CZ) specimens and to identify false-positive CZ reactions caused by cross-reacting bacteria. Cervical specimens were collected from 2,891 women. Chlamydia prevalence by tissue culture (TC) was 9.2% (266 of 2,891 specimens). Compared with TC, the sensitivity and specificity of CZ were 78.9% (210 of 266 specimens) and 98.2% (2,577 of 2,625 specimens), respectively. There were 48 CZ false-positive reactions. The direct fluorescent-antibody test (DFA) was positive for 31 of 48 false-positive reactions, indicating culture misses. Thus, when the standard was both TC and DFA, CZ sensitivity was 81.1% and CZ specificity was 99.3%. Of the 17 CZ-positive patients who were negative by both TC and DFA, 3 were negative on repeat CZ and 11 of 14 were identified as false positive by the confirmatory assay. The confirmatory test was positive for CZ-positive women who were positive by TC or DFA. Use of the confirmatory test, which increased the specificity to 99.9%, would increase confidence in positive CZ results and make the test more useful for screening populations with a low prevalence of C. trachomatis infection.

摘要

用于检测衣原体抗原的酶免疫测定法常用于诊断沙眼衣原体感染。与所有非培养方法一样,这些检测的特异性令人关注。在四个性传播疾病检测点对一种确证阻断试验(雅培实验室,伊利诺伊州北芝加哥)进行了评估。该试验旨在确证衣原体酶免疫测定法(CZ)的真阳性标本,并识别由交叉反应细菌引起的CZ假阳性反应。从2891名女性中采集了宫颈标本。组织培养(TC)显示衣原体患病率为9.2%(2891份标本中的266份)。与TC相比,CZ的敏感性和特异性分别为78.9%(266份标本中的210份)和98.2%(2625份标本中的2577份)。有48例假阳性的CZ反应。直接荧光抗体试验(DFA)在48例假阳性反应中有31例呈阳性,表明培养结果漏检。因此,当标准为TC和DFA两者时,CZ的敏感性为81.1%,特异性为99.3%。在TC和DFA均为阴性的17例CZ阳性患者中,3例重复CZ检测为阴性,14例中的11例被确证试验鉴定为假阳性。确证试验对TC或DFA呈阳性的CZ阳性女性呈阳性。使用确证试验将特异性提高到了99.9%,这将增加对CZ阳性结果的信心,并使该检测对于筛查沙眼衣原体感染患病率较低的人群更有用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
The evaluation of diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections.性传播感染诊断试验的评估。
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2005 Mar;16(2):80-2. doi: 10.1155/2005/107162.
4
The laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.沙眼衣原体感染的实验室诊断。
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2005 Jan;16(1):39-44. doi: 10.1155/2005/359046.
5
Diagnosis and assessment of trachoma.沙眼的诊断与评估
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Oct;17(4):982-1011, table of contents. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.982-1011.2004.
6
Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostics.沙眼衣原体诊断
Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Aug;78(4):232-4. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.4.232.

本文引用的文献

2
Cross-reactivity between Chlamydiazyme and Acinetobacter strains.
N Engl J Med. 1986 Apr 3;314(14):922-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198604033141413.
4
Asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men.
Sex Transm Dis. 1986 Jul-Sep;13(3):163-5. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198607000-00010.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验