Braddock L E
Girton College, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0JG, UK.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2006 Sep;37(3):394-413. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.06.012.
The paper links Freud's early work in the 'Project for a scientific psychology' with the psychoanalytic psychology of Kleinian object relations theory now current. Freud is often accused of introducing mechanism into his psychology and installing at its core an irreconcilable dichotomy of two disparate ways of explaining human behaviour. I suggest that Freud's early mechanistic thinking is an attempt at what he only partly achieves, a functional account of the 'mental apparatus'. I consider whether this way of conceptualising the mind in functional terms is methodologically relevant to psychoanalytic investigation or whether it is at best heuristically useful. From a brief consideration of Kleinian object relations theory, illustrated by case material, I conclude that there are grounds for accepting the first of these alternatives.
该论文将弗洛伊德在《科学心理学大纲》中的早期著作与当前流行的克莱因派客体关系理论的精神分析心理学联系起来。弗洛伊德常常被指责在其心理学中引入了机械论,并在其核心设置了两种截然不同的解释人类行为方式的不可调和的二分法。我认为,弗洛伊德早期的机械论思维是他试图(但只是部分实现)对“心理装置”进行功能性描述的尝试。我思考这种从功能角度概念化心灵的方式在方法论上是否与精神分析研究相关,或者它至多是否只是启发式有用。通过对克莱因派客体关系理论的简要思考,并辅以案例材料说明,我得出结论,有理由接受上述两种选择中的第一种。