Wilde M C
The University of Texas Medical School-Houston, Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Dec;20(4):702-15. doi: 10.1080/13854040500246901.
The construct validity of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) was investigated in a sample of 210 acute ischemic stroke patients seen on an inpatient rehabilitation unit. Intercorrelations between the six index scores were found to be relatively consistent with previously published work. A principal components analysis yielded a two-factor (Language/Verbal Memory and Visuospatial/Visual Memory) solution that accounted for 61% of the variance. Correlations generated between the resulting factor scores, the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWA), the Visual Form Discrimination Test (VFD), Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) Complex Ideational Material Test (CIM), the presence of neglect as determined by Line Bisection Test performance, and the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) supported the validity of these factors. A comparison of the obtained factor scores in a subgroup of 111 left and right hemispheric stroke patients showed that the left hemispheric stroke patients performed more poorly on the Language/Verbal Memory factor score than did right hemispheric stroke patients while the converse was true for the Visuospatial/Visual Memory factor score. Implications for the construct validity of the RBANS and its use and interpretation in clinical assessment are discussed.
在一个由210名入住住院康复科的急性缺血性中风患者组成的样本中,对可重复神经心理状态评估量表(RBANS)的结构效度进行了研究。发现六个指标分数之间的相互关联与先前发表的研究结果相对一致。主成分分析得出了一个双因素(语言/言语记忆和视觉空间/视觉记忆)解决方案,该方案解释了61%的方差。所得因素分数与受控口语单词联想测验(COWA)、视觉形式辨别测验(VFD)、波士顿诊断性失语症检查(BDAE)复杂观念材料测验(CIM)、通过直线二等分测验表现确定的忽视情况以及简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)之间的相关性支持了这些因素的效度。对111名左、右半球中风患者亚组中获得的因素分数进行比较,结果显示,左半球中风患者在语言/言语记忆因素分数上的表现比右半球中风患者差,而在视觉空间/视觉记忆因素分数上则相反。本文讨论了RBANS结构效度及其在临床评估中的使用和解释的意义。