Kabanarou Stamatina A, Crossland Michael D, Bellmann Caren, Rees Angela, Culham Louise E, Rubin Gary S
Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Ophthalmology. 2006 Dec;113(12):2251-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.028. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
To determine and explain gaze changes during binocular versus monocular viewing in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Cross-sectional study.
Twenty-nine patients with bilateral late-stage AMD.
Distance acuity and fundus pathologic features were evaluated. Eye position was recorded while viewing a circular fixation target under monocular and binocular viewing conditions using an infrared eye tracker (SMI Gazetracker, SensoMotoric, Germany; Eyelink Software 2.04). Gaze changes were quantified by calculating the mean x-coordinate and y-coordinate eye position of the center of the bivariate contour ellipse area for a 30-second fixation task under both viewing conditions. Retinal loci used for monocular fixation for each eye were determined using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO; SLO 101, Rodenstock, Munich, Germany).
Gaze position.
Nine patients showed no shift in gaze position from monocular to binocular viewing. Three patients demonstrated a shift in both eyes, and 17 patients demonstrated a shift in only 1 eye. The mean shift was 4.7+/-5 degrees (standard deviation). The shift in gaze position in the worse eye was predictive of the distance between the 2 monocular preferred retinal loci (PRLs; better and worse eye; r(2) = 0.59; P<0.0001), whereas there was no association between the shift in gaze position in the better eye and distance (r(2) = 0.00; P = 0.91).
Most AMD patients shift gaze position in 1 or both eyes when viewing binocularly compared with monocularly. These changes suggest that different retinal locations are used for fixation under the 2 viewing conditions. The SLO data showed that these patients are likely to demonstrate monocular PRLs that fall on noncorresponding areas. These results may have implications for the effective development of eccentric viewing and binocular behavior of AMD patients.
确定并解释年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者双眼与单眼注视时的注视变化。
横断面研究。
29例双侧晚期AMD患者。
评估远视力和眼底病理特征。使用红外眼动仪(德国SensoMotoric公司的SMI Gazetracker;Eyelink软件2.04)在单眼和双眼注视条件下观察圆形注视目标时记录眼位。通过计算两种注视条件下30秒注视任务的双变量轮廓椭圆区域中心的平均x坐标和y坐标眼位来量化注视变化。使用扫描激光检眼镜(德国慕尼黑Rodenstock公司的SLO 101)确定每只眼睛用于单眼注视的视网膜位点。
注视位置。
9例患者从单眼注视到双眼注视时注视位置无偏移。3例患者双眼均有偏移,17例患者仅1只眼有偏移。平均偏移为4.7±5度(标准差)。较差眼的注视位置偏移可预测两只眼单眼偏好视网膜位点(PRL;较好眼和较差眼)之间的距离(r² = 0.59;P<0.0001),而较好眼的注视位置偏移与距离之间无关联(r² = 0.00;P = 0.91)。
与单眼注视相比,大多数AMD患者双眼注视时1只眼或双眼的注视位置会发生偏移。这些变化表明在两种注视条件下用于注视的视网膜位置不同。扫描激光检眼镜数据显示这些患者的单眼PRL可能落在非对应区域。这些结果可能对AMD患者偏心注视和双眼行为的有效发展有影响。