Suppr超能文献

在指向任务中比较注视性和功能性视网膜优势位置

Comparing the fixational and functional preferred retinal location in a pointing task.

作者信息

Sullivan Brian, Walker Laura

机构信息

Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, 2318 Fillmore St., San Francisco, CA 94115, United States; Tobii Technology AB, Karlsrovägen 2D, 182 53 Danderyd, Sweden.

Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, 2318 Fillmore St., San Francisco, CA 94115, United States; Envision, Inc., 610 N. Main St., Wichita, KS 67203, United States.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2015 Nov;116(Pt A):68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

Abstract

Patients with central vision loss (CVL) typically adopt eccentric viewing strategies using a preferred retinal locus (PRL) in peripheral retina. Clinically, the PRL is defined monocularly as the area of peripheral retina used to fixate small stimuli. It is not clear if this fixational PRL describes the same portion of peripheral retina used during dynamic binocular eye-hand coordination tasks. We studied this question with four participants each with a unique CVL history. Using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope, we measured participants' monocular visual fields and the location and stability of their fixational PRLs. Participants' monocular and binocular visual fields were also evaluated using a computer monitor and eye tracker. Lastly, eye-hand coordination was tested over several trials where participants pointed to and touched a small target on a touchscreen monitor. Trials were blocked and carried out monocularly and binocularly, with a target appearing at 5° or 15° from screen center, in one of 8 locations. During pointing, our participants often exhibited long movement durations, an increased number of eye movements and impaired accuracy, especially in monocular conditions. However, these compensatory changes in behavior did not consistently worsen when loci beyond the fixational PRL were used. While fixational PRL size, location and fixation stability provide a necessary description of behavior, they are not sufficient to capture the pointing PRL used in this task. Generally, patients use a larger portion of peripheral retina than one might expect from measures of the fixational PRL alone, when pointing to a salient target without time constraints. While the fixational and pointing PRLs often overlap, the fixational PRL does not predict the large area of peripheral retina that can be used.

摘要

中心视力丧失(CVL)患者通常采用偏心注视策略,利用周边视网膜中的首选视网膜位点(PRL)。临床上,PRL单眼定义为用于注视小刺激的周边视网膜区域。目前尚不清楚这种注视性PRL是否描述了动态双眼眼手协调任务中使用的周边视网膜的相同部分。我们对四名有独特CVL病史的参与者进行了这项研究。使用扫描激光检眼镜,我们测量了参与者的单眼视野以及他们注视性PRL的位置和稳定性。还使用计算机显示器和眼动仪评估了参与者的单眼和双眼视野。最后,通过多次试验测试眼手协调能力,参与者在触摸屏显示器上指向并触摸一个小目标。试验被分组进行,单眼和双眼分别进行,目标出现在距屏幕中心5°或15°的8个位置之一。在指向过程中,我们的参与者经常表现出较长的运动持续时间、眼动次数增加和准确性受损,尤其是在单眼条件下。然而,当使用超出注视性PRL的位点时,这些行为上的代偿性变化并没有持续恶化。虽然注视性PRL的大小、位置和注视稳定性提供了行为的必要描述,但它们不足以捕捉该任务中使用的指向性PRL。一般来说,在没有时间限制的情况下指向一个显著目标时,患者使用的周边视网膜部分比仅根据注视性PRL测量所预期的要大。虽然注视性PRL和指向性PRL经常重叠,但注视性PRL并不能预测可使用的大面积周边视网膜。

相似文献

6
The Preferred Retinal Locus Used to Watch Videos.观看视频时使用的首选视网膜位置。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Dec 1;58(14):6073-6081. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-21839.

本文引用的文献

3
Task-specific fixation behavior in macular disease.黄斑病变的特定任务注视行为。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jan 21;52(1):411-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5473.
4
Plasticity of fixation in patients with central vision loss.中心视力丧失患者注视的可塑性。
Vis Neurosci. 2009 Nov;26(5-6):487-94. doi: 10.1017/S0952523809990265. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
6
Age-related macular degeneration.年龄相关性黄斑变性
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2606-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0801537.
10
Retinal locus for scanning text.用于扫描文本的视网膜位点。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006 Sep-Oct;43(6):749-60. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2005.06.0102.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验